Van Veen
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,740
- Reaction score
- 14,249
I haven't seen SPR in a long time, but it struck me that much of the gore/realism was front loaded, then we get an updated version of a 1940s/50s patriotic war film.?
The Pacific was good, Band of Brothers is like the gold standard. Its like Saving Private Ryan without as much gore but more stories. I mean, there's gore, just not as graphic as Ryan.
band of brothers was great in that it seemed not to stake out a position other than celebrating what citizen-soldiers went through in ww2. if you dig into the actual history a little more there are plenty of nits to pick, though. there are at least two prominent characters whose real-life stories were changed a little too much for me to be comfortable with.
the pacific was flawed, but realistically it could never be as good as band of brothers. there was not much to celebrate in the pacific theater. the combat episodes were as good as anything, and did a very good job of portraying things that we don't see very often because they do not translate to the screen very well. (the night battle at alligator creek) the material furthest removed from combat was the weakest, in part because some of it was completely made up. (at least bob ostensibly tried to stick to history. you can blame some of the inaccuracies on the source material [ambrose])
looking forward to masters of the air. it was stuck in development hell forever, but it's actually in production now. i've read the book, and i'm curious to see if they tackle some of the more difficult subjects.