Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

What shoes not to buy!

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by sinnedk, Feb 20, 2011.

  1. sinnedk

    sinnedk Senior member

    Messages:
    12,434
    Likes Received:
    2,532
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Location:
    San Francisco
    I think SF needs to compile a list of what men's shoes not to ask about and not to buy. I'll start...
    1. Aldo - dont buy, dont look, dont consider, just plain eww
     


  2. noob in 89

    noob in 89 Senior member

    Messages:
    8,087
    Likes Received:
    8,035
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Meh, I could do with less groupthink around here...

    At least tell us why you don't like an entire brand of shoes.
     


  3. btinl

    btinl Senior member

    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    1. Kenneth Cole - poor construction, cheap leather, terrible design and fit
    2. Ecco - comfortable but really ugly shoes
    3. Bruno Magli - ask OJ Simpson
    4. Cole Haan - overpriced, poorly constructed
    5. Hugo Boss - overpriced, the sizing varies greatly for each model
    6. Florsheim - they've really gone down hill in terms of quality
     


  4. sinnedk

    sinnedk Senior member

    Messages:
    12,434
    Likes Received:
    2,532
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Meh, I could do with less groupthink around here...

    At least tell us why you don't like an entire brand of shoes.


    every single men's shoe i have ever seen from them are bad quality and ugly... i think that warrants a brand to be garbage
     


  5. sinnedk

    sinnedk Senior member

    Messages:
    12,434
    Likes Received:
    2,532
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Location:
    San Francisco
    1. Kenneth Cole - poor construction, cheap leather, terrible design and fit
    2. Ecco - comfortable but really ugly shoes
    3. Bruno Magli - ask OJ Simpson
    4. Cole Haan - overpriced, poorly constructed
    5. Hugo Boss - overpriced, the sizing varies greatly for each model
    6. Florsheim - they've really gone down hill in terms of quality


    +1
     


  6. noob in 89

    noob in 89 Senior member

    Messages:
    8,087
    Likes Received:
    8,035
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Yeah, I'm just saying it's hard to be objective about these things. When I was in college, square-toe shoes were in; everyone from the high-end designers to Rockport to Banana Republic were making them, and Kenneth Cole, with his square-y-est of square toes, paid for a lot of advertising in magazines like GQ and Esquire. And bizarrely, GQ and Esquire told you they were hip, and people bought them, and people lauded their quality and construction on the interwebs.

    Fast forward a few years, you see less KC advertising in those glossy mags, you've got Esquire doing a 180, saying square-toes aren't the mark of a 'gentleman' (or whatever BS they're peddling to those who want to appear upper middle class), and subsequently, internet bros who don't really know about quality and construction telling you about quality and construction.

    Just saying: grain of salt.
     


  7. MyOtherLife

    MyOtherLife Senior member

    Messages:
    6,501
    Likes Received:
    475
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Location:
    The Arena - Centerfield
    1. Kenneth Cole - poor construction, cheap leather, terrible design and fit
    2. Ecco - comfortable but really ugly shoes
    3. Bruno Magli - ask OJ Simpson
    4. Cole Haan - overpriced, poorly constructed
    5. Hugo Boss - overpriced, the sizing varies greatly for each model
    6. Florsheim - they've really gone down hill in terms of quality


    [​IMG] Slap!
     


  8. SpooPoker

    SpooPoker Internet Bigtimer and Most Popular Man on Campus Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    37,002
    Likes Received:
    40,699
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2009
    Location:
    LuxeSwap
    Edward Green. Unless you like extra edge dressing with your recrafts. [​IMG]
     


  9. Master Squirrel

    Master Squirrel Senior member

    Messages:
    1,279
    Likes Received:
    33
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    USSteel's all-steel boot with wire laces...

    Not rust proof.
     


  10. LaymanX

    LaymanX Senior member

    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    107
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    1. Kenneth Cole - poor construction, cheap leather, terrible design and fit
    2. Ecco - comfortable but really ugly shoes
    3. Bruno Magli - ask OJ Simpson
    4. Cole Haan - overpriced, poorly constructed
    5. Hugo Boss - overpriced, the sizing varies greatly for each model
    6. Florsheim - they've really gone down hill in terms of quality


    +1.. and add Geox - Overpriced, poor construction.
     


  11. Harold falcon

    Harold falcon Senior member

    Messages:
    27,426
    Likes Received:
    7,614
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Location:
    NE PA
    Meh, I could do with less groupthink around here...

    At least tell us why you don't like an entire brand of shoes.


    Agreed. It's better to ask which shoes to buy. Try to remain positive and all that.
     


  12. Knucklehead

    Knucklehead Senior member

    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Yeah, I'm just saying it's hard to be objective about these things. When I was in college, square-toe shoes were in; everyone from the high-end designers to Rockport to Banana Republic were making them, and Kenneth Cole, with his square-y-est of square toes, paid for a lot of advertising in magazines like GQ and Esquire. And bizarrely, GQ and Esquire told you they were hip, and people bought them, and people lauded their quality and construction on the interwebs.

    Fast forward a few years, you see less KC advertising in those glossy mags, you've got Esquire doing a 180, saying square-toes aren't the mark of a 'gentleman' (or whatever BS they're peddling to those who want to appear upper middle class), and subsequently, internet bros who don't really know about quality and construction telling you about quality and construction.

    Just saying: grain of salt.


    I like this member's position. If there's too much groupthink we'll all essentially be in uniforms. Equanimity is key. I'm throwing my grain of salt alongside his. In other words...+1!
     


  13. BlueHorseShoe

    BlueHorseShoe Senior member

    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    If the shoe curls upwards, (fugly pleather elf shoe disasters) best avoid.
     


  14. Northampton Novice

    Northampton Novice Senior member

    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    24
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Jeffrey West - poorest quality corrected grain leather available, used on badly constructed blake or on a half decent GY welt (for the price) but the CG leather is so bad Kenneth Cole wouldn't use it.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by