• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • Styleforum Gives - Holiday Charity Auction 7: Castangia from SARTORIALE

    We are very proud to present this year's edition of the Styleforum Holiday Charity Auctions, this year in support of the Ronald McDonald House Charities of Spokane (www.rmhcspokane.org). Each Auction lasts 24 hours. Please follow and bid on all the auctions.

    The 6th auction is for a Castangia Suit or Sportcoat from SARTORIALE Please bid often and generously here

    Fok and the Styleforum Team.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

What makes a shoe more or less formal?

SVS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
161
Reaction score
3
I'm looking for a pair of formal shoes to wear with suits to important events (business meetings, interviews, funerals, etc), but I'm not clear regarding what makes a shoe more or less formal. Clearly, black is more formal than brown but beyond that, I'm lost.

Are bluchers more formal than balmorals? Why is a cap toe considered more formal than a split toe? is a whole cut the most formal? Is brogueing considered less formal? Are slip-ons or monks ever considered formal enough? How should I think of shoes in terms of formality?

After reading the post here, I realize I'm not familiar enough with the sartorial norms.
 

kaxixi

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
1,904
Reaction score
21
I am no expert, but here is what I've gathered.

Originally Posted by SVS
Are bluchers more formal than balmorals?

No, other way around. Bals are sleeker, maybe because you can't see leather stitched to leather. http://www.askandyaboutclothes.com/f...p?t-58100.html

Originally Posted by SVS
Why is a cap toe considered more formal than a split toe?

Cap toe is cleaner. Perhaps there is also a historical reason?

Originally Posted by SVS
is a whole cut the most formal?

No, cap toe is more formal, perhaps because the "cap" doesn't crease as much at the toes as a whole cut.

Originally Posted by SVS
Is brogueing considered less formal?

I thought so, but a salesman once insisted that it is not. I am planning on wearing cap toes with brogueing on the cap to some upcoming interviews.

Originally Posted by SVS
Are slip-ons or monks ever considered formal enough?

For what? I like wearing monks with a suit, but it isn't conservative, and not appropriate, for example, for an interview.
 

goodlife

Senior Member
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
205
Reaction score
1
kaxixi pretty much covered all of the OPs questions, but as I seemingly have nothing better to do, I will try to be a little more comprehensive in case anyone ever uses the search function. For the sake of streamlining this post I will omit shoes worn with day and evening formal wear, as well as boots, and focus on styles that that could/should be worn with suit and sportcoat ensembles.

upper material
calf
cordovan
pebble grain
suede

sole material
leather
double leather
dananite
crepe
commando

color
black
burgundy
darker browns
medium browns
light browns
tan
cream
white

lacing (for lack of a better term)
closed (oxfords, bals, etc)
open (bluchers, derbys, etc)
wholecuts
monks
slip-ons

embellishment
captoe
quarter brogue (brogue detail along the cap)
half brogue (brogue detail along cap and around laces)
semi-brogue (brogue detail along cap, around laces, and on heal)
brogue/wingtip
austerity brogue (brogue pattern, but with plain stitching instead of perforations)
*punched patterns can be added to any of the above, resulting in a slightly less formal shoe
split toe
 

SVS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
161
Reaction score
3
Thanks. Great posts.

I've never been a fan of cap toes. Maybe I just need to find a better looking pair of cap toes.
 

manouche

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
867
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by SVS
I'm looking for a pair of formal shoes to wear with suits to important events (business meetings, interviews, funerals, etc), but I'm not clear regarding what makes a shoe more or less formal. Clearly, black is more formal than brown but beyond that, I'm lost.

Are bluchers more formal than balmorals? Why is a cap toe considered more formal than a split toe? is a whole cut the most formal? Is brogueing considered less formal? Are slip-ons or monks ever considered formal enough? How should I think of shoes in terms of formality?

After reading the post here, I realize I'm not familiar enough with the sartorial norms.



The shape = oxfords are formal, monks could be formal, berdy are cacual, laofers are for indians

Escarpins are the most formal and should be shiny
 

indy116

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by goodlife
I will try to be a little more comprehensive in case anyone ever uses the search function.

Nothing there is that surprising to me but it's good to see it all laid out.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How many pairs of shoes do you own?

  • 1 - 4

    Votes: 29 3.6%
  • 5 - 10

    Votes: 140 17.3%
  • 11 - 20

    Votes: 265 32.8%
  • 21 - 30

    Votes: 129 15.9%
  • 31 - 40

    Votes: 69 8.5%
  • 41 - 50

    Votes: 48 5.9%
  • 51 - 60

    Votes: 24 3.0%
  • 61 - 70

    Votes: 22 2.7%
  • 71 - 80

    Votes: 17 2.1%
  • 81 - 90

    Votes: 7 0.9%
  • 91 - 100

    Votes: 8 1.0%
  • 100+

    Votes: 51 6.3%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
428,927
Messages
9,226,000
Members
193,668
Latest member
cynthiaarhorst
Top