• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

what is your religion?

briancl

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,210
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Jill
Um, certainly the US. But I was referring to the world.

worldrel.gif


Why do you ask? Do you think there is any country in the world that is 50% Athiest?


It's no secret that this country's religious centers are located in the rural and/or southern southern states. On a smaller scale, even urban districts in Texas voted for Kerry.

If you look at only nothern states and cities, the percentages change dramatically.
 

marc237

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
2,353
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by dah328
That is most certainly true. In exactly the same way, atheism also requires faith such that even in the face of some amazing event that served to prove beyond any sort of doubt the existence of a deity, the majority would continue to be unconvinced.

Dah-

I am not sure I follow. As a practicing apatheist and skeptic, I certainly appreciate that questions such as the formation of the Universe and the meaning of life are great imponderables.

My problem with all organized religions and deistic belief systems is that, having examined each faith's theory of a supernatural omnipotent being(s) who a) formed the universe, b) erected a rather complex reward and punishment system, and c) seems to prefer being worshipped, I remain unpersuaded. I am not unpersuadable, simply unpersuaded. I continue to believe that the burden of proof is on the proponent of the belief system and, to date, no one has sustained his/her burden yet.
 

Stu

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
2,323
Reaction score
16
Originally Posted by Dakota rube
This, my dear friend, not only explains a lot, but is a prescription for years and years of very expensive — and unfortunately not helpful — psychotherapy.
laugh.gif


I can't decide whether to pray a novena, build an orphanage or run for the town council as a Republican.
laugh.gif
 

cheapmutha

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,875
Reaction score
70
i voted christian, but i would never go to a church. i feel jesus had alot of good teachings, but paul fucked it all up when he came in with his roman mind.
 

skalogre

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,348
Reaction score
157
Originally Posted by chrysalid
^i think i saw david copperfield do that in vegas.

laugh.gif
 

Saucemaster

Sized Down 2
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,510
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by marc237
I am not sure I follow. As a practicing apatheist and skeptic, I certainly appreciate that questions such as the formation of the Universe and the meaning of life are great imponderables.

My problem with all organized religions and deistic belief systems is that, having examined each faith's theory of a supernatural omnipotent being(s) who a) formed the universe, b) erected a rather complex reward and punishment system, and c) seems to prefer being worshipped, I remain unpersuaded. I am not unpersuadable, simply unpersuaded. I continue to believe that the burden of proof is on the proponent of the belief system and, to date, no one has sustained his/her burden yet.


Thank you! I was going to dogpile on dah328, but you pretty much said what I was going to. I'd add that, while there are undoubtedly many atheists in the world who would cling to their beliefs no matter what happened (as would, I feel compelled to point out, many theists of various stripes), a great number of us are atheists simply because, having reviewed the evidence and examined our logic, we simply do not believe that there is any good reason to believe in a deity.

There are plenty of ways in which I sort of miss my belief in God, and the occasional comfort and structure it provided, but my atheism (under Kent Wang's definition, which is simply lacking a positive belief in God--atheism lite, I guess) just results from my desire to be honest with myself. If I discovered or was shown some clear reason to believe in God, I would probably accept it joyfully.
 

Margaret

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,259
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Saucemaster
Thank you! I was going to dogpile on dah328, but you pretty much said what I was going to. I'd add that, while there are undoubtedly many atheists in the world who would cling to their beliefs no matter what happened (as would, I feel compelled to point out, many theists of various stripes), a great number of us are atheists simply because, having reviewed the evidence and examined our logic, we simply do not believe that there is any good reason to believe in a deity.

There are plenty of ways in which I sort of miss my belief in God, and the occasional comfort and structure it provided, but my atheism (under Kent Wang's definition, which is simply lacking a positive belief in God--atheism lite, I guess) just results from my desire to be honest with myself. If I discovered or was shown some clear reason to believe in God, I would probably accept it joyfully.


This makes sense to me. What I don't understand are people of all stripes (Christian, Muslim, Atheist, whatever) who are so hostile to other people's choice of belief systems. As far as I'm concerned, as long as you're not trying to harm someone else, you can believe in whatever the hell you want -- Christ, Mommamed, Xenu, The Almighty Dollar, whatever. If it works for you and helps you make sense of the world, and helps you answer some of the otherwise unanswerable questions, cool. No skin off my nose.
 

dah328

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Messages
4,581
Reaction score
114
Originally Posted by marc237
I am not sure I follow. As a practicing apatheist and skeptic, I certainly appreciate that questions such as the formation of the Universe and the meaning of life are great imponderables.

My problem with all organized religions and deistic belief systems is that, having examined each faith's theory of a supernatural omnipotent being(s) who a) formed the universe, b) erected a rather complex reward and punishment system, and c) seems to prefer being worshipped, I remain unpersuaded. I am not unpersuadable, simply unpersuaded. I continue to believe that the burden of proof is on the proponent of the belief system and, to date, no one has sustained his/her burden yet.

This does not negate what I posted. That you are unpersuaded as to the existence of a particular deity is no proof that one does not exist. That you choose to live your life as if none exist is therefore an act of faith -- a rather significant act of faith as the consequences in most religions for such actions are rather severe. I intend only to point out that atheism is no less a dogmatic and faith-based belief system than any other deistic belief system.
 

Saucemaster

Sized Down 2
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,510
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by Margaret
This makes sense to me. What I don't understand are people of all stripes (Christian, Muslim, Atheist, whatever) who are so hostile to other people's choice of belief systems. As far as I'm concerned, as long as you're not trying to harm someone else, you can believe in whatever the hell you want -- Christ, Mommamed, Xenu, The Almighty Dollar, whatever. If it works for you and helps you make sense of the world, and helps you answer some of the otherwise unanswerable questions, cool. No skin off my nose.

I agree in theory, but in practice, Scientology drives me batshit insane. Seeing someone convert to Scientology is kind of like seeing someone get intellectually mugged. But yeah, I try to live the principle anyway.
smile.gif
 

Saucemaster

Sized Down 2
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,510
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by dah328
This does not negate what I posted. That you are unpersuaded as to the existence of a particular deity is no proof that one does not exist. That you choose to live your life as if none exist is therefore an act of faith -- a rather significant act of faith as the consequences in most religions for such actions are rather severe. I intend only to point out that atheism is no less a dogmatic and faith-based belief system than any other deistic belief system.

Excuse me? Do you feel you are acting on "faith" when you decide not to believe that Zeus and the rest of the Greek pantheon are watching you from Mt. Olympus? No. For that matter, do you think that your (presumed) non-belief in dragons is a significant act of faith? I mean, if you're wrong, the consequences could be similarly severe. Trogdor, for example, could burninate the countryside and/or the peasants.

It takes no faith to *not* believe in something that isn't materially affecting you. Or, if you prefer, it takes a hell of a lot LESS faith to not believe in the things hoped for and unseen than it does to believe in them. Under your assertion above, any belief of any sort, anywhere, requires "faith". I submit that, at the very least, this makes the term almost completely and utterly useless.
 

Matt

ex-m@Triate
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
10,765
Reaction score
275
Originally Posted by Margaret
This makes sense to me. What I don't understand are people of all stripes (Christian, Muslim, Atheist, whatever) who are so hostile to other people's choice of belief systems. As far as I'm concerned, as long as you're not trying to harm someone else, you can believe in whatever the hell you want -- Christ, Mommamed, Xenu, The Almighty Dollar, whatever. If it works for you and helps you make sense of the world, and helps you answer some of the otherwise unanswerable questions, cool. No skin off my nose.
exactly what I think. If having Christ/Allah/Buddah/Tom Cruise/Vishnu or whoever else in your life makes you believe that you are a better man than you would be without them, then I am all for it.
 

tiger02

Militarist
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,733
Reaction score
3
The dogmatic faith of atheists usually takes the form of a worshipping of reason, which is no different a belief system than any other propagated throughout history.

My problem with all organized religions and deistic belief systems is that, having examined each faith's theory of a supernatural omnipotent being(s) who a) formed the universe, b) erected a rather complex reward and punishment system, and c) seems to prefer being worshipped
None of these have anything to do with a/theism per se, but only the specifics of individual religious structures.
 

Saucemaster

Sized Down 2
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,510
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by tiger02
The dogmatic faith of atheists usually takes the form of a worshipping of reason, which is no different a belief system than any other propagated throughout history.

In what sense are you intending the word "reason" here? Because if you're just talking about logic, then it's not a "belief system" per se. It doesn't really matter what you do, something cannot be both A and Not A at the same time. It's just how things are.
 

tiger02

Militarist
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,733
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by Saucemaster
In what sense are you intending the word "reason" here? Because if you're just talking about logic, then it's not a "belief system" per se. It doesn't really matter what you do, something cannot be both A and Not A at the same time. It's just how things are.
Exactly.
 

Saucemaster

Sized Down 2
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,510
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by tiger02
Exactly.

But not, though. I mean, existence is literally unthinkable without the basic tenets of logic, and it's literally *impossible* to imagine something being red and not red at the same time, for example. It's on a very different plane than something like believing in the existence of a deity. One is a fundamental precondition for the act of belief or thought in any form, the other is the *content* of belief/thought. It's a crucial distinction.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,486
Messages
10,589,866
Members
224,252
Latest member
ColoradoLawyer
Top