• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

What is your current "conditioning" level?

XenoX101

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
4,606
Reaction score
20
Originally Posted by Fuuma
Did a diss your leopard panties? You've been really catty as of late...

Didn't you get the memo? Anyone who complains about anything is automatically a crybaby, duh.

Personally, I think Uncontrol is projecting.
 

Asch

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by pistolero
I think it was fuuma who said earlier in this thread that a good wardrobe doesn't have to be a large wardrobe. Even with SF conditioning, I might spend ~ 10k on clothes in a year, max. That might be more than the average for someone with my income level, but probably not ridiculously more. I just have a lot fewer (but better) clothes, which is ok with me.
Modern Americans are a lot stingier about clothing than you might imagine: http://www.freeby50.com/2009/06/how-...n-clothes.html
 

Murdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
lurker[1].gif
 

KitAkira

Wait! Wait! I gots an opinion!
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
8,589
Reaction score
118
Originally Posted by DLester
I started and deleted at least four different posts intended for this thread, each containing an entirely different reaction. I have decided that it leaves me mute.
+1 I've realized that I need to shift some button up moneys for sweater/outerwear pieces. Only problem is my size, good small **** disappears before it makes it to sale
 

tagutcow

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
625
Originally Posted by Asch
Modern Americans are a lot stingier about clothing than you might imagine: http://www.freeby50.com/2009/06/how-...n-clothes.html
"Added up thats $1,604 per year. The average household has 2.5 people so this comes to $641 per person on average spent on shoes and clothing."
Well then I actually spend less than average on clothes!
bigstar[1].gif
 

ppllzz

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
4,312
Reaction score
70
Originally Posted by sipang
Yeah, but you should make the distinction between "price you consider normal/appropriate" and "instakop". Those are two different things IMO even if they're sometimes conflated (= baller). Being around SF has completely skewed my conditioning level but that doesn't mean I can afford half of the **** I consider "appropriately priced", it just means I don't scoff at a $300 shirt and I'd buy it if I had the $$$. In other words, this can only end in tears. Or maybe that's just me and I'm fucked up...
i use to go at saks, look at a $300 shirt (or $750 sneakers) and think to myself, "who in the world would buy this shirt?" after almost a year on SF, i know many, many people who would (and im not included). i think thats what is meant by "conditioning level"
 

impolyt_one

Timed Out
Timed Out
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
14,336
Reaction score
4,779
he's right though man. sq4you just paid more for that jil face tee shirt than you will for all of your clothes in 2010. live a little
 

AntiHero84

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
2,442
Reaction score
72
Originally Posted by robbie
I could probably afford more,spend time,shop online, try to save up and score gilt, surf the bay... but i am addicted to thrift stores, ...

This ^^. But if I'm buying new...

jeans: $200
button down: $70
trousers: $100
suit: $500
dress shoes: $250
casual shoes: $60
casual boots: $150
cardigan/pullover: $100
Outerwear: $200
Ties: $30
tshirt: $5
 

CharlieAngel

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
165
Depends on my debt load, really.

Currently, anything under about $30 can be an impulse buy, but anything over $150 is pretty much out, atm, and must be planned for. Student loans suck.

It is income related, though. When I had a "real" job, I'd still not pay $500 for shoes, but I'd definitely keep an eye out on the sale rack for when they dropped sub-$300 (example: Paul Smith shoes) on seasonal sale. $150 Crates/APCs/Nudies would be the norm, with the occasional $250 RRL-level pair. I've always been **** for shirts (mostly a t-shirt/cheap polo for work kinda guy), but I imagine $100 wouldn't have been much of a stretch (think J Crew level stuff). I'm much happier when I'm not worried about ******* up expensive clothes. I ride motorcycles and bicycles and walk a lot, so the less worry, the better.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.9%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 89 37.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 39 16.3%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 37 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,793
Messages
10,591,834
Members
224,312
Latest member
WealthBrainCode1
Top