soaped
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 1,192
- Reaction score
- 725
The most arch support I've ever had in a pair of shoes were a pair of White's 350 on the 55 arch-ease last. I didn't need the support but it was fairly comfortable. None of the Wescos I've tried had anywhere near that level of arch support.
Wesco has better stitching and construction uniformity (especially on the quarters) if that is important to you. I've never really seen a perfect pair of White's outside of their Goodyear welted Main Street line whereas I've seen plenty of well finished Wescos.
Both are work boot companies and I'm sure a uniform stitch run is not something that is of high concern for them. I think the Wescos are priced at a premium too so that is another consideration. The White's though, are a more burly shoe.
Wesco has better stitching and construction uniformity (especially on the quarters) if that is important to you. I've never really seen a perfect pair of White's outside of their Goodyear welted Main Street line whereas I've seen plenty of well finished Wescos.
Both are work boot companies and I'm sure a uniform stitch run is not something that is of high concern for them. I think the Wescos are priced at a premium too so that is another consideration. The White's though, are a more burly shoe.
As someone in the UK who is considering a pair of White’s I was also wondering how Wesco compare?
Iron Heart have a selection and I like the look of the jobmaster in British tan.
One of the big appeals of Whites to me is the arch support and I was wondering how the Wesco compare in support and just general comfort?
I hear Wesco are supposed to be better finished off.
Thanks