Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by lpalma121, Mar 7, 2013.
If my boy Frank can do it why not... what are your thoughts?
Frank could probably do whatever he wanted... I haven't tried this before.
If you mean with just the penultimate button fastened, then I have always understood (and my Savile Row tailor agrees) that this is de rigeur.
You've been around since 2009 and you're asking this?
Yes. You can leave it unbuttoned, have it pressed into a semi 3-roll-2, or have it pressed into a full 3-roll-2. Most around here will opine that all three are superior to buttoning the top button. I'll occasionally button the top button depending on the jacket.
You can press the jacket so the lapel doesn't fold flat. But you can't change where the lapel rolls just by pressing. The collar needs to be altered for that.
From what I understand, that's why it's called a 3-roll-2...it isn't going to look like a 2 button but will have a distinctive roll starting from at or near the middle button and rolling over the third, covering it completely. But as it's not a practice I engage in (if I wanted a two button, I would've purchased a two button), so I could very well be wrong in this.
I found this thread regarding the 3 roll 2 style, for a minute there I thought I was a game changer but i see some here are already doing this.
You can't make a jacket into a 3-roll-2 by just pressing. It's cut differently to get the lapel to roll over.
if it's a true 3B, ie the lapel falls to the top button, then I think it should be acceptable to close the top two. If you want to just do the middle, it can be worn that way but I think it fits a bit strangely. Matt S is technically correct from what I know, a true 3B is actually cut differently than a 2B so it'll never quite fit right but yes, you could attempt to press the collar so it'll softly roll closer to the 2nd button and wear it like that.
Separate names with a comma.