shoreman1782
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2004
- Messages
- 8,728
- Reaction score
- 6,883
No offense stitches, but "jawnz" ≠ "jeans"
Last edited:
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
No offense stitches, but "jawnz" ≠ "jeans"
Lol @ a lot of money and pain. Sounds like you are remembering a time of hardship lol
Get
Outta
Town
if you think so... I disagree on your observation of IST's jacket, so be it.
fo rizzle? i had been lead to believe that jawns was an acceptable SF cool guy way of referring to jeans in general. please to school me on the difference.
and the loafers work for him also. I could not wear them but thats his look and overall he looks good. If I had to guess who he was out of the blue, I would peg him as some jazz musician, bohemian ne'er do well, or son of african dictator spending money like its water.