• STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Ways to sew on buttons

demeis

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2004
Messages
1,286
Reaction score
2
I was wondering how to tell hand sewn buttons vs. machine sewn. I know that most cross stiched are machine, and that crows foot are hand stitched. I have a barbera shirt that has the parrel sewing with one horizontal strand which i'm guessing is hand sewn, but what about simply parrell buttons? Also is there any other ways to sew buttons on that are either hand sewn and machine sewn.

regards
Nik
 

uriahheep

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
265
Reaction score
1
There are no absolute rules on button attachment methods, e.g. "Parallel attachments are always done by hand, cross-stitched attachment is done by machine, crows-foot is done by hand," etc.
Now there are machines capable of doing all three methods. Two-hole and even three-hole buttons can be attached by machine. Machines can easily do shanks.
In general, though, a button was probably attached by hand if it is held in place by a small number of fairly tight stitches made using a thicker thread. A button was probably attached by machine if it is held in place by many loose stitches made using thin thread.

[edit] an additional note: when buttons are attached using two rows of parallel stitches and a single horizintal stitch, you can be almost certain that it was done by machine. Machines, unlike humans, seem to be unable(to date.) of crossing over to sew the second row without carrying that a stitch across.
 

Renault78law

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
2,141
Reaction score
67
I agree with the above, there are no absolutes. I think the best way is to look at the regularity of the 'feet of the button' (sorry, I don't know the correct term). A machine made one will always be symmetrical and regular, whereas a hand sewn button won't be. Most machine sewn buttons don't sew a shank, whereas hand sewn do. And most machine sewn buttons won't be knotted at the underside (they're usually not knotted at all), whereas a hand sewn will.
 

Alexander Kabbaz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
11
A machine made one will always be symmetrical and regular, whereas a hand sewn button won't be.
The lady who sews my buttons would beg to differ.
 

uriahheep

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
265
Reaction score
1
And most machine sewn buttons won't be knotted at the underside (they're usually not knotted at all), whereas a hand sewn will.
Better makers who attach buttons by hand leave the knot hidden under the button.
 

Alexander Kabbaz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
11
Better makers who attach buttons by hand leave the knot hidden under the button.
Again, I respectfully beg to differ. A properly hand-sewn button has NO knot.
 

T4phage

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
6,117
Reaction score
686
Better makers who attach buttons by hand leave the knot hidden under the button.
Again, I respectfully beg to differ. A properly hand-sewn button has NO knot.
I've seen some that were passed thru the shank or underneath the stitches and then trimmed.
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,912
Reaction score
105
I finish mine through the shank. Just did about 10 last night, stole some nice MOPs off a Robert Talbott thrift store shirt and put them on a Polo Philip.

But I do have a starting knot. I put it on the top of the fabric, under the button, so it is mostly covered. Is there a way around this?

Also, what kind of thread should I be using? I was using regular Coats poly-cotton, doubled.
 

Alexander Kabbaz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
11
I've seen some that were passed thru the shank or underneath the stitches and then trimmed.
Now you've got it.

Also, what kind of thread should I be using?
Cotton glacÃ
#24.

But I do have a starting knot. I put it on the top of the fabric, under the button, so it is mostly covered. Is there a way around this?
Just run the thread three times through the shirt in opposite directions. Trim the tail. Begin sewing your button continuing to sew through your original three stitches. Finish as you correctly described. Launder the shirt. The glacÃ
shrinks a great deal. The shrinkage locks the threads into an unbreakable, cohesive whole.
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,912
Reaction score
105
I figured that might be the answer. With the #24, does one double that, or is it thick enough as is? And how many times through, how many times around, etc?

Just wondering, my method works, but may as well do it right.
 

Alexander Kabbaz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
11
Yes - double. Four times through the button (two per each set of two holes). Shank wrap 5 times tight.. Three finishing lockstitches through the shank.
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,912
Reaction score
105
Excellent, I am right on except the thread and starting stitch. Thanks.
 

Renault78law

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
2,141
Reaction score
67
Better makers who attach buttons by hand leave the knot hidden under the button.
Again, I respectfully beg to differ. A properly hand-sewn button has NO knot.
Thanks for the tips Alex. Just to clarify, are you saying that a starting knot (the knot you tie after threading the needle) is extraneous, or that there is actually some merit to '[running] the thread three times...and [trimming] the tail'? Does your opinion change if you're not using a thread that will shrink, eg polyester thread?
 

Alexander Kabbaz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
11
Just to clarify, are you saying that a starting knot (the knot you tie after threading the needle) is extraneous, or that there is actually some merit to '[running] the thread three times...and [trimming] the tail'? Does your opinion change if you're not using a thread that will shrink, eg polyester thread?
Starting knot extraneous - leaves a bump- Ugh. Three pre-stitches - yes, have merit vs. a knot in that they are flat and smooth. None of the above will work with Ugh.yester thread.
 

HitMan009

Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
703
Reaction score
4
Love to see a demonstration of this.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Favorite Shorts Length

  • Above the knee

  • Knee length

  • Below the knee

  • None of the above

  • Mid-thigh ("short shorts")


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
461,519
Messages
10,014,298
Members
208,328
Latest member
PrinceOverseas
Top