rms
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2020
- Messages
- 163
- Reaction score
- 227
What’s the sizing on jumbo crews like? I’m 5’7 145. Should I go for a 1 or 2?
[/QUOTE
I would go for a size 1
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
What’s the sizing on jumbo crews like? I’m 5’7 145. Should I go for a 1 or 2?
[/QUOTE
I would go for a size 1
Agreed.
You get your Thorson II yet? Curious how it looks on in a 3 or 4.
fit is so good on the II, wish they did that from day 1, just superb.
Here’s the size 2 in black at KITH. Definitely too small but they didn’t have the 3 or the 4. Thinking 4 would might be better, but I already have the coach jacket in ivory...kinda serves the same purpose.I’m normally a 4 in VISVIM outerwear from older seasons but went with a 3 in Thorson I because the arms were too long in the 4. I agree that Thorson II is better fit wise especially for layering because it’s a little bit longer and offers more room around the chest and shoulders.
Better fit than the og ?, especially those sleeves ?fit is so good on the II, wish they did that from day 1, just superb.
Here’s the size 2 in black at KITH. Definitely too small but they didn’t have the 3 or the 4. Thinking 4 would might be better, but I already have the coach jacket in ivory...kinda serves the same purpose.
Yes, and those ballooning sleeves on the first Thorson. Fantastic, oily, dye though, never seen that again.I think so, problem is the og was cut in the similar aesthetic as all old vis patterns, ie skeleton shoulders and long ass set-in sleeves which to me is a super unflattering cut. An extreme example is the barnstorm jacket:
View attachment 1560608
By increasing the volume around the shoulder area and having it dropped, the fit can accommodate different body styles without requiring sizing up, which many of us are familiar with on old vis, but tends to make the arms long as hell and look kinda stupid, so you can follow the general guidelines of the oversized stuff: if you want a more true fit, go true to (US/EU) sizing, or if you want an exaggerated fit go up one.
Honestly you'd probably be fine in a 3. What is your height and weight if you dont mind me asking? Ive noticed that the sleeves tend to be pretty long on their updated cuts, IE 4 is close to 92cm for non-ribbed garments and closer to 95cm with ribbed garments
5'9 185 with broad shoulders, which is the main reason 3s don't typically work for me. I have the OG Thorson in a 3 and the Barnstorm check in a 4. They are now two of my wife's favorite jackets....Honestly you'd probably be fine in a 3. What is your height and weight if you dont mind me asking? Ive noticed that the sleeves tend to be pretty long on their updated cuts, IE 4 is close to 92cm for non-ribbed garments and closer to 95cm with ribbed garments
yes, they used the same outsole as contemporary FBT's. They're about knee high or covers the calf depending on how tall you are.Do the fbt trapper highs run the same size wise as the normal fbts? Seems to be a pretty rare shoe and not much information out there. Also how high would you say the shaft is?