• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

sam67

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
1,491
Reaction score
5,839
Time to get up the road. Jarmans.
IMG_1626.JPG
 

Nealjpage

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
5,012

vestbash

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
829
Some of the write-ups are pure bunk as well, at least for the shoes that I know anything about. But credit where credit is due, great photography and an amazing collection. It is fun to look at and he does seem to move a few pairs. More power to him.

He will also attribute shoes to the incorrect maker. For private label manufactured shoes that he has for sale on his website, this is not uncommon.
 

happypebble

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2019
Messages
773
Reaction score
1,595
Vintage violation. I've been wearing boots lately. Courts are still in limbo but I return to the office on Monday.

In the mean time, my son asked me to take pictures of a rainbow. After I dropped him off, I walked to a local man made lake to enjoy some time alone.

These are Wolverine 1000 Miles that a cobbler added lug sole protectors to make them unusable in any weather.

View attachment 1468992 View attachment 1468993 View attachment 1468994 View attachment 1468996
that reminds me, I kept meaning to ask what people thought of those Wolverine 1000 Mile boots. Good, bad, meh? I know they're expensive but they look nice.
 

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reaction score
19,661
that reminds me, I kept meaning to ask what people thought of those Wolverine 1000 Mile boots. Good, bad, meh? I know they're expensive but they look nice.

I bought these near NOS on ebay for cheap. They are durable but not fashionable. I vote meh.

I like my Chipppewa Ellison the most, in terms of fit and comfort.
 

CWOyaji

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
3,554
Reaction score
24,225
Thanks! I'm lucky that my work gets me out and about so I can visit stores a couple of days a week, but weekend thrifting is over for me since Covid hit. Lately the end of day stops have been working the best.
 
Last edited:

Jiqea

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2018
Messages
1,573
Reaction score
7,914
I acquired a lovely pair of late 1950's Dack's "Cambridge" U-wings yesterday. This is one of my favourite Dack's designs, and I have owned at least 6 pairs over the years. The Cambridge shows up in advertisements circa 1950, no doubt to cash in on the growing U-wing fad that started in the late 40's in the United States.

The first iteration of the Cambridge was offered in smooth calf with four eyelets, exterior metal grommets, and a thick leather strap "lace" with a buckle, as seen below in a 1950 advert. By 1954 this design was changed to add an extra pair of eyelets, with period advertisements illustrating the Cambridge in now familiar Scotch grain leather, still with exterior metal grommets and now using regular heavy laces. The pair I have just received are identical to the pair shown in the 1955 advert shown below, with the exception that the metal grommets are now on the interior of the lace stay flaps. I believe the laces to be original.

I suspect my pair date to sometime 1958 or shortly thereafter. They have the "Extra-Quality" sock-liner which was introduced in 1958, but retain a 3 digit style code (392). It is highly unusual to see a 3 digit style code on a post 1958 shoe (my first time), but in reviewing the 1950's ads I realized that the Cambridge was offered only in brown. The fourth digit in the Dack's style code was added circa 1955, with a 3 in front of the old three digit number indicating black and a 2 indicating brown. Perhaps because there was no black version of this shoe offerred in the 1950's Dack's just continued on with the old style code. In the early 60's a black version of the Cambridge was available, and going forward both the black and brown versions have a four digit assignation. The Cambridge continued to be offered right through until the mid-80's, even after the U-wing craze had ended.

My pair also intrigued me in that the toe medallion is different than all other pairs I have owned. It has a gracile bird in flight (or moth) design as seen below. A careful examination of the 1955 advert shows this same design. I have provided a comparison of this early medallion to the later version in a photo below, with the earlier medallion on the left. The shoe on the right of this image is still quite early, with nailed leather heels, which leads me to think this change in medallion style happened circa 1960. It is quite uncommon to find Dack's with nailed leather heels after that time. All of the Cambridge Dack's that I have seen were built on the 67 last.

It is also interesting to note that in the 1950's adverts, as well as on the sock-liner of these early versions of the Cambridge, there is no mention of them being made of "Zebu Grain" leather. Later versions of the Cambridge all have "Imported Zebu Grain" stamped on the sock liner and have rubber heels.

Overall I was pretty excited to pick up this pair and in a wearable size for me, 9.5E. I was also pleased to find I already owned a pair of Dack's 1950's 695 "Shield" shoe-trees that fit perfectly.

IMG_5353.jpg
IMG_5355b.jpg
IMG_5356.jpg
IMG_5354.jpg
IMG_5357a.jpg


1950-53 Cambridge Advert
1953a The Cambridge.JPG

1954-1956 Cambridge Advert
1954a The Cambridge.JPG
 
Last edited:

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reaction score
19,661
Florsheim Friday.

These originally had v-cleats but made with CG. One of many bad moves by Florsheim.

But CG make for great rain shoes. A cobbler rebuilt with Vibram Eton soles so now I can wear them anywhere.

I hope the brotherhood enjoys the weekend. I return to work Monday but still mostly working from home.

20201002_074300.jpg
20201002_074312.jpg
 

Nobleprofessor

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2015
Messages
3,546
Reaction score
9,672
It’s a little cold here in the Mid-South. Thus, I could not wear my typical work from home polo and shorts. So, I figured some fall shoes would be good with jeans.

These are some of my VERY favorite shoes. They are MTO suede Florsheim from the 60’s. VERY light wear. I’m pretty sure I just scratched up my wood floor with the vcleat!


F6F94702-241F-41A7-BC46-F3B2F2A0D59B.jpeg
5B9BE0F6-DCAE-45C2-99B1-30B718627BF1.jpeg
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,936
Messages
10,592,953
Members
224,338
Latest member
Antek
Top