Jiqea
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2018
- Messages
- 1,573
- Reaction score
- 7,914
I picked up another pair of the venerable Dacks 2330 water bison whole-cuts. I have 4 pairs in my size now. I plan to try them all out this week and decide which pair to let go. Any man of distinction needs at least three pairs of the same model; one for home, one for the office, and one to keep at the apartment of your mistress.
This model was introduced in the 50's as part of the top of the line S.E. Dack offerings. Up until about 1955 they would have had a 3 digit style code, in this case 330. At some point in the mid 50's Dack's added a fourth digit, with a 2 indicating brown and a 3 indicating black. In the late 70's this model was discontinued, being replaced by the Kudu antelope whole-cut which did not have the decorative stitching. That model was numbered as the 2331 or 3331 depending on if they were brown or black. I have attached the only ad I have ever found for this shoe, which is from 1976. Unfortunately it does not provide the shoe name.
This pair were rebuilt by Dack's sometime in the 70's based on the sock-liner style (not pictured). My understanding is that Dack's maintained a rebuild shop in Toronto even after general production moved to New Brunswick circa 1960. For the longest time a Dack's rebuild cost $10.00, which would have been about 30-35% of the cost of the shoe new through to about 1965. It is interesting that the rebuild stamp that was impressed on the waist of the sole uses the old Dack's script logo from pre-1949. Clearly in the re-branding after S.E. Dack sold the firm in 1949, they didn't bother to have a new re-build stamp cut with the "fat" modern logo.
This model was introduced in the 50's as part of the top of the line S.E. Dack offerings. Up until about 1955 they would have had a 3 digit style code, in this case 330. At some point in the mid 50's Dack's added a fourth digit, with a 2 indicating brown and a 3 indicating black. In the late 70's this model was discontinued, being replaced by the Kudu antelope whole-cut which did not have the decorative stitching. That model was numbered as the 2331 or 3331 depending on if they were brown or black. I have attached the only ad I have ever found for this shoe, which is from 1976. Unfortunately it does not provide the shoe name.
This pair were rebuilt by Dack's sometime in the 70's based on the sock-liner style (not pictured). My understanding is that Dack's maintained a rebuild shop in Toronto even after general production moved to New Brunswick circa 1960. For the longest time a Dack's rebuild cost $10.00, which would have been about 30-35% of the cost of the shoe new through to about 1965. It is interesting that the rebuild stamp that was impressed on the waist of the sole uses the old Dack's script logo from pre-1949. Clearly in the re-branding after S.E. Dack sold the firm in 1949, they didn't bother to have a new re-build stamp cut with the "fat" modern logo.