Uhhhh wow. What size?
7.5 DWhat size on the moss??
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Uhhhh wow. What size?
7.5 DWhat size on the moss??
Hey, I live in rural Oregon, which is even more of a fashion wasteland. At least you've got the Cities and there's a few Fortune 500 companies in the outlying areas that required well-dressed executives.Man, your posts make me consider checking out thrift stores. I have friends who go, but I generally hear that because Minnesota is far from a fashion Mecca, and the weather is so hard on shoes, it's not a fruitful endeavor. I am a bit green at the moment...
4100 is probably 10 D.What size do you make these other than pretty wide?
MEN'S J.F. MCELWAIN BROWN LONG WING BROGUE SHOES 4100 B61113 JR 06381X | eBay
Maybe you can get the size from the shoe stamp. Pre-owned condition. See pics for condition. Not worn a lot.www.ebay.com
Hello, Japan!7.5 D
Spot on commentary. The shoe that I referred to earlier as the finest I’ve ever handled was from the Denny Murray line. I absolutely agree that the J&M handmades were the nicest American made shoes from at least 1970-the end of production. My rankings earlier were solely for longwings in the 70s-80s which I think is what most people are thinking of when they’re asking about relative vintage shoe quality.My initial thought was the same as Vestbash, it's entirely a function of when they were made. Bostonian's Denny Murray (sp?) line was incredible. I think that 1960s LB Sheppards and Nettleton Traditionals are on par with Florsheim Imperials, but both brands cut quality earlier (and more obviously) than Florsheim. I'd argue that Johnston and Murphy Handgrades (up to the early 90s) are (and were) the best quality of shoe made in the US for going back to when the Clapp factory closed in the late 1960s.
I CAN squeeze my feet into that size if necessary. I might wear 'em for a bit myself. When will I ever own another pair?Hello, Japan!
I’ll have to look again,I thought I saw the cracking on the brogueing rather than the main body of the heel. That would indicate the crack couldn’t spread very far
I don't think so, because of the wrinkles here:I'm asking for a friend. Are these shell? I'm noticing the fading.
View attachment 1434685
+1I don't think so, because of the wrinkles here:
View attachment 1434687
I live in Silicon Valley, home to @CWOyaji, so I find nothing at thrift stores because he cleans house.Hey, I live in rural Oregon, which is even more of a fashion wasteland. At least you've got the Cities and there's a few Fortune 500 companies in the outlying areas that required well-dressed executives.
This was the first time I ever needed a cart for my haul.I live in Silicon Valley, home to @CWOyaji, so I find nothing at thrift stores because he cleans house.
I think it becomes pretty impossible to rank brands generally if you’re not doing it based on a specific style and era. Even within that, the variation can be vast. The nicest shoe I’ve ever handled is a 1950s Bostonian, but I wouldn’t rank all 1950s Bostonians over all 1950s shoes from another maker. It could be fun to rank based on average quality of that maker, but it’s tough because there were so many differences. That being said, I’m a sucker for pre-1960s Clapps and Stetsons.