• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

wasmisterfu

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2018
Messages
5,023
Reaction score
14,880
@CWOyaji

These landed yesterday. I am 99% sure that these are from 1984. I was my son's age when these were produced. They are definitely in better shape than my old pair, which I am most likely going to dye green. Coincidentally, there is a tiny nick on the toe of this pair as well and I have not decided what, if anything, to do about it. For now, I am going to leave it as is since I will never see it in real life. Anyway, I had a chance to do some work on them today.

1. Clean / Sanitize insole and linings.
2. Wipe down upper with Lexol cleaner and a wet microfiber.
3. Two coats of Bick 4 on upper, lining, and insole.
4. Cleaned the welts with a sonicare toothbrush (wife's brush head, shhhhh) and some bar soap.
5. One coat of VSC.
6. One thin coat of saphir neutral wax polish.

View attachment 1397892 View attachment 1397891

View attachment 1397894

View attachment 1397895
Man, those came out looking mint.
 

happypebble

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2019
Messages
773
Reaction score
1,595
@CWOyaji

These landed yesterday. I am 99% sure that these are from 1984. I was my son's age when these were produced. They are definitely in better shape than my old pair, which I am most likely going to dye green. Coincidentally, there is a tiny nick on the toe of this pair as well and I have not decided what, if anything, to do about it. For now, I am going to leave it as is since I will never see it in real life. Anyway, I had a chance to do some work on them today.

1. Clean / Sanitize insole and linings.
2. Wipe down upper with Lexol cleaner and a wet microfiber.
3. Two coats of Bick 4 on upper, lining, and insole.
4. Cleaned the welts with a sonicare toothbrush (wife's brush head, shhhhh) and some bar soap.
5. One coat of VSC.
6. One thin coat of saphir neutral wax polish.

View attachment 1397892 View attachment 1397891

View attachment 1397894

View attachment 1397895
very nice looking. Simple and elegant, plus the color is quite nice. ***winning***
 

stook1

Master Builder
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Messages
3,923
Reaction score
10,358
Thanks gentlemen. This is a 2 birds / 1 stone upgrade since it frees up my old pair for a fun project.

Here's a very nice pair of NOS 9D Nettleton longwings that I just found for sale. I really like Nettletons and would try to grab these if they were my size. They are not mine, just to be 100% clear.

 

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reaction score
19,661
@friendlygoz got me all paranoid about whether I would fit into my shoes. So on a cool and windy day, I pulled out my Hanover LB Sheppards in 8.5eee size. Thank goodness, they still fit without issue. Teaches me to listen to some random person on styleforum.

These were rebuilt with GR soles, cat paw heels, and a rubber sole protector. Perfect casual or dressy shoe, IMHO.

Enjoy the weekend ahead, gents.
20200530_160238.jpg
20200530_160248.jpg
 

friendlygoz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
3,042
Reaction score
14,804
@friendlygoz got me all paranoid about whether I would fit into my shoes. So on a cool and windy day, I pulled out my Hanover LB Sheppards in 8.5eee size. Thank goodness, they still fit without issue. Teaches me to listen to some random person on styleforum.

These were rebuilt with GR soles, cat paw heels, and a rubber sole protector. Perfect casual or dressy shoe, IMHO.

Enjoy the weekend ahead, gents. View attachment 1397953 View attachment 1397954
Sorry to infect you with my paranoia. I’m not that random, am I? Those look fantastic by the way.
 

wasmisterfu

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2018
Messages
5,023
Reaction score
14,880
Ok, AE expert @wasmisterfu, have you ever seen Strands with a blind-stitched sole?

View attachment 1397978

View attachment 1397979

View attachment 1397980
Nope, AE never did; they didn’t even channel the bottom stitch until 1999 or so. Those aren’t factory soles or heels.

Sadly, those mid 80’s Strands appear to have been the victim of a glue and go cobbler. The channeled welt top-stitch appears to be original, which means the cobbler just skivved down the old sole and glued on a new one, along with tacking on a heel. I’m pretty sure there’s no feather hiding a bottom outsole stitch; doesn’t look like Bedo’s grade work or anything.

I wouldn’t pay much for those because, depending on how whacked out the work is that was done, AE might reject them for factory recrafting. Sure Bedo’s or BNelson can do a better than factory recraft, but my feeling is that I should have the option of a factory recraft and I won’t pay much for shoes that were worked on incorrectly.
 

Nealjpage

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
5,012
Not original soles. Probably glued on leather.
To my knowledge, AE has never done a shoe with a blind-stitched sole.
Non original soles and heels, as others have said.
Those have a lot more wear than I think you realize
Nope, AE never did; they didn’t even channel the bottom stitch until 1999 or so. Those aren’t factory soles or heels.

Sadly, those mid 80’s Strands appear to have been the victim of a glue and go cobbler. The channeled welt top-stitch appears to be original, which means the cobbler just skivved down the old sole and glued on a new one, along with tacking on a heel. I’m pretty sure there’s no feather hiding a bottom outsole stitch; doesn’t look like Bedo’s grade work or anything.

I wouldn’t pay much for those because, depending on how whacked out the work is that was done, AE might reject them for factory recrafting. Sure Bedo’s or BNelson can do a better than factory recraft, but my feeling is that I should have the option of a factory recraft and I won’t pay much for shoes that were worked on incorrectly.
Thanks, guys!
 

wasmisterfu

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2018
Messages
5,023
Reaction score
14,880
Non original soles and heels, as others have said.
Those have a lot more wear than I think you realize
I’d say that’s only the second set of soles, but they’ve been worn hard on both the factory soles, and this set.

However, the uppers and welt are still in good shape, the insoles are okay (especially if they start getting some regular hydration). The heel linings look suspect, but some conditioning for the linings might slow that deterioration (though fit will play a role in that also).

There’s definitely life left in these shoes (with care, probably quite a lot in my experience), but I’d go super low-ball on any offer for these shoes.
 

stook1

Master Builder
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Messages
3,923
Reaction score
10,358
I’d say that’s only the second set of soles, but they’ve been worn hard on both the factory soles, and this set.

However, the uppers and welt are still in good shape, the insoles are okay (especially if they start getting some regular hydration). The heel linings look suspect, but some conditioning for the linings might slow that deterioration (though fit will play a role in that also).

There’s definitely life left in these shoes (with care, probably quite a lot in my experience), but I’d go super low-ball on any offer for these shoes.

I wouldn't buy those shoes either. Strands are readily available and there is nothing special about this pair in my view. The hacked soles would bug me and I'm not sure it's even worth the cost to properly resole them given that one could probably find a pretty mint pair for around $100 without a great deal of effort. ie. less than the cost of even an AE resole. Had they been MY shoes originally, it very well might change the calculus since they'd be molded to my feet but in that case they wouldn't have been hacked in the first place.

By the way, I will admit that I am somewhat curious about whether AE would resole these. I think they might since it's not like the insoles have been stitched through or some really bad hack.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
506,921
Messages
10,592,724
Members
224,335
Latest member
IELTS とは
Top