• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

kilowatts

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
956
Reaction score
2,806
They’re still technically at the top (along with its sibling, the opera pump). However, outside of certain London and New York institutions, they’re purely optional.

As for the ever more gauche Windsor (née Haus Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha) family, and their modes of dress, they’re running around wearing beat-up wingtips with morning coat, which is ridiculous:
prince_harry_hole_in_shoe.jpg

If you can’t be bothered to do it right, just don’t do it at all.
Hi Misterfu:
Technically no longer part of the royal gang. However, who the hell knows how those people justify their behaviour but then again as my builder says, “l can’t see it from my house!”. Poor things.
kilowatts
 

CWOyaji

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
3,554
Reaction score
24,225
Harry should be wearing Alan McAfee wingtips like these. An example of CG (or at least coated leather) done right. They had a hole in the sole when I thrifted them, but unlike our formerly royal friend, I had them redone. As we do. From London, for Bullock & Jones, San Francisco.
27A84E51-D567-4634-B685-B9BB921D6B46.jpeg

Sorry about the haze on the lens, here they are at the office:
ED1231F6-2671-47C8-8724-188E3ACA73D4.jpeg

It's the Langton
62F26541-6C50-42CA-9AF8-BEEC47BDC289.jpeg
 
Last edited:

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reaction score
19,659
Non vintage violation, but a worthwhile one.

We all know that modern day Florsheims are not worth much and constructed poorly. The company is a ghost of its past. Duckie Florsheim is one major exception, along with the first few pairs made in India in the 90s.

I recently e-thrifted these Florsheim custom line boots. I took a gamble for the price. I believe these were tried on and never worn again. So let's analyse.

Leather - Horween, but very very thin. Soft and supple, and cleaned up easily with just some brushing and one dose of Bick 4. The leather feel unconstructed and flimsy relative to my Red Wings and Wolverine 1000 Miles.

Stitching (exterior) - Not bad. See for yourself.

Stitching (interior) - Poorly executed. Sloppy stitch work overall. Things are not lined up.

Soles - Clearly marked as GYW. The outsole stitching is decent. The welt holes are clear and the job was overall well done. Heels are lined up and nailed in.

The boots feel very light. I compare them to my Red Wings and Wolverine 1000 Miles. Even relative to shoes, these feel like feathers. I would not be surprised if torn apart, most of the interior is material like carpet filler, as opposed to cork.

Fit - These are 9.5D. For vintage Florsheim, it's one of the sizes I can fit in. These are snug, so won't be able to wear thick socks with them.

Comfort - Will need to wear a few times to evaluate. Upgrades? I will ask a cobbler to install speed hooks, rubber sole protector, and lulu tips.

20200529_113946.jpg
20200529_114005.jpg
20200529_114013.jpg
20200529_114027.jpg
20200529_114033.jpg
20200529_114044.jpg
20200529_120413.jpg
20200529_120419.jpg
20200529_120438.jpg
Overall? For $65 USD, these aren't bad. GYW boots, by a brand that has some standards. I would never pay full price for these.
 

ccpl14

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 6, 2017
Messages
1,259
Reaction score
7,590
Non vintage violation, but a worthwhile one.

We all know that modern day Florsheims are not worth much and constructed poorly. The company is a ghost of its past. Duckie Florsheim is one major exception, along with the first few pairs made in India in the 90s.

I recently e-thrifted these Florsheim custom line boots. I took a gamble for the price. I believe these were tried on and never worn again. So let's analyse.

Leather - Horween, but very very thin. Soft and supple, and cleaned up easily with just some brushing and one dose of Bick 4. The leather feel unconstructed and flimsy relative to my Red Wings and Wolverine 1000 Miles.

Stitching (exterior) - Not bad. See for yourself.

Stitching (interior) - Poorly executed. Sloppy stitch work overall. Things are not lined up.

Soles - Clearly marked as GYW. The outsole stitching is decent. The welt holes are clear and the job was overall well done. Heels are lined up and nailed in.

The boots feel very light. I compare them to my Red Wings and Wolverine 1000 Miles. Even relative to shoes, these feel like feathers. I would not be surprised if torn apart, most of the interior is material like carpet filler, as opposed to cork.

Fit - These are 9.5D. For vintage Florsheim, it's one of the sizes I can fit in. These are snug, so won't be able to wear thick socks with them.

Comfort - Will need to wear a few times to evaluate. Upgrades? I will ask a cobbler to install speed hooks, rubber sole protector, and lulu tips.

View attachment 1397323 View attachment 1397324 View attachment 1397325 View attachment 1397326 View attachment 1397327 View attachment 1397328 View attachment 1397330 View attachment 1397331 View attachment 1397332 Overall? For $65 USD, these aren't bad. GYW boots, by a brand that has some standards. I would never pay full price for these.
Out of curiosity, do you know the country of manufacture?
 

eTrojan

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2017
Messages
1,714
Reaction score
9,167
View attachment 1396222 View attachment 1396223
2 of probably my oldest vintage pairs. Allen Edmonds Empire from 1957. They are basically museum pieces at this point as the leather is brittle and the top-lines are extremely rough.

I worked for Allen Edmonds for about 7 years. At one time had over 70 pairs of AE but have whittled my collection down to 3 pairs - these and early 00’s black park avenue.

The Empire is beautiful. I have a pair that I’ve been bringing slowly back to life.

I need to have a skilled cobbler look at a necessary repair before I can wear them. But if he says he can manage the repair, I have every intention of wearing them.
 

eTrojan

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2017
Messages
1,714
Reaction score
9,167
This is definitely a thing, but I wonder about the shortening of length. I'd expect it to be longer not shorter.
Could this be a case of lock down induced weight gain or increased sedentary habits? Feet could be used to not being in (tighter fitting) dress shoes and now he's noticing a difference?

I think it’s something about how the AE guys read the Brannock. They tried to tell me I was a 12B, despite the fact that they couldn’t find a 12B that actually fit (and they don’t stock A-width in-store).
 

happypebble

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2019
Messages
773
Reaction score
1,595
Non vintage violation, but a worthwhile one.

We all know that modern day Florsheims are not worth much and constructed poorly. The company is a ghost of its past. Duckie Florsheim is one major exception, along with the first few pairs made in India in the 90s.

I recently e-thrifted these Florsheim custom line boots. I took a gamble for the price. I believe these were tried on and never worn again. So let's analyse.

Leather - Horween, but very very thin. Soft and supple, and cleaned up easily with just some brushing and one dose of Bick 4. The leather feel unconstructed and flimsy relative to my Red Wings and Wolverine 1000 Miles.

Stitching (exterior) - Not bad. See for yourself.

Stitching (interior) - Poorly executed. Sloppy stitch work overall. Things are not lined up.

Soles - Clearly marked as GYW. The outsole stitching is decent. The welt holes are clear and the job was overall well done. Heels are lined up and nailed in.

The boots feel very light. I compare them to my Red Wings and Wolverine 1000 Miles. Even relative to shoes, these feel like feathers. I would not be surprised if torn apart, most of the interior is material like carpet filler, as opposed to cork.

Fit - These are 9.5D. For vintage Florsheim, it's one of the sizes I can fit in. These are snug, so won't be able to wear thick socks with them.

Comfort - Will need to wear a few times to evaluate. Upgrades? I will ask a cobbler to install speed hooks, rubber sole protector, and lulu tips.

View attachment 1397323 View attachment 1397324 View attachment 1397325 View attachment 1397326 View attachment 1397327 View attachment 1397328 View attachment 1397330 View attachment 1397331 View attachment 1397332 Overall? For $65 USD, these aren't bad. GYW boots, by a brand that has some standards. I would never pay full price for these.
By the way, if one is looking for work boots rather than dress boots, Florsheim's current Utility boots are quite decent.
 

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reaction score
19,659

jpm1

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
7,923
I think it’s something about how the AE guys read the Brannock. They tried to tell me I was a 12B, despite the fact that they couldn’t find a 12B that actually fit (and they don’t stock A-width in-store).
There are a couple of ways to interpret the brannock. You can take the straight length/width reading or you can take the arch length (heel to ball measurement). Both can be helpful but neither are absolute. Brannock doesn’t account for volume and other fit anomalies.

So while the brannock is a great guide and starting point for fit, it comes down to the ability of the fitter to be able to gauge your foot shape and apply it to knowledge of the particular last fit properties. Some will go longer/narrower, some shorter/wider. In a lot of cases, the length/width measurement is the right way to go too.

In my experience, higher end shoes generally run slightly on the longer side. For a brand like AE that offers an array of widths, to me, it doesn’t make sense to go longer when you have widths available. One exception would be for Bals with high insteps an going wider isn’t enough so adding length is the fix.

I’m a 12C width so I get your struggle with access to sizes/lasts to try at a shop.
 

woofmang

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
3,243
Reaction score
14,311
Wearing my early 90s AE Black Cherry Shell Bristols today:

20200529_bristols.jpg


(And an unsolicited plug for Bick 4: I was beginning to worry about these; after a dozen wears or so over about a year's time, the rolls in the vamp were starting to seem very dry, and I was afraid they might crack if that got much worse. Following someone's recommendation - can't recall if it was here or on another SF thread - I picked up a bottle of Bick 4, and after my last wear a couple of weeks ago, thoroughly conditioned them inside and out with it. I let them sit overnight, put their trees back in, bagged them up, and put them up. Today, they're smooth and supple-looking all around. I'm very happy with the results.)
 

friendlygoz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
3,042
Reaction score
14,804
I think it’s something about how the AE guys read the Brannock. They tried to tell me I was a 12B, despite the fact that they couldn’t find a 12B that actually fit (and they don’t stock A-width in-store).
I think so too. The sales associate seem to be surprisingly unknowledgeable. When I mentioned that “I have a hard time with the fit on the 5 last,” She said she had never heard of the 5 last. I had to explain to her that that was shorthand for the 65 last.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.9%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 89 37.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 39 16.3%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 37 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,795
Messages
10,591,872
Members
224,311
Latest member
akj_05_
Top