1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Value inversely proportional to marketing spend?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by chorse123, May 19, 2006.

  1. chorse123

    chorse123 Senior member

    Messages:
    10,448
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2004
    Something's got to cover those full page glossy magazine ads, right? Discuss.
     
  2. johnnynorman

    johnnynorman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    71
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    I think there is a correlation, but not a causal connection. I would argue that, to the extent the glossy ads are effective in creating brand panache that exceeds the quality of the garment (Armani being the best example), then it only makes sense for the manufacturer to water down quality. Until the ads are effective in making the brand conscious consumer want to purchase that brand, I think that the marketing will merely cut into initial margins.
     
  3. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    the overall revenue generated is proportianal to marketing spending. if the margin is huge, and the marketing can get people to buy the product, then a lot of money will be spent on marketing. the high margin suggests low value, but that isn't always the case.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by