1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Updated views and perspectives for current 2016 ranges - English shoe quailty

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by GZero, Feb 19, 2016.

  1. GZero

    GZero Member

    Messages:
    8
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2016
    Dear SF ladies and Gentlemen,

    There appears to be very little “specification” information associated with shoes from the major names; while you can feel the difference between a well-constructed shoe, what elements of construction constitute this?

    Does anyone fancy having a stab at updating the list to include current ranges?

    Crockett & Jones (Main collection, Hand grade); Cheaney (Classic, Imperial); Edward Green; Alfred Sargent (Exclusive, Hand grade); Loake (1880); Grenson (G:Zero, G:One); Barker (Handcrafted, Anniversary); Church’s (Classic)

    I’m getting into shoes in a big way and want to make informed choices as I build my collection.

    Obviously, I’m keen to hear from people who own shoes in these ranges and how you would rank them.

    Thanks in advance.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by