1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

tumi alpha 20" or 22"

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by T900, Jan 1, 2009.

  1. pnewelljr

    pnewelljr Senior member

    Messages:
    470
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
  2. philosophe

    philosophe Senior member

    Messages:
    4,892
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    22 is too big for carry on on most airlines.
     
  3. pnewelljr

    pnewelljr Senior member

    Messages:
    470
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
    I was hoping since it is just a little fatter and not taller it might be okay, but it is pointless to have a carry on that can't actually be carried on.
     
  4. pnewelljr

    pnewelljr Senior member

    Messages:
    470
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
    The important thing to note is techically they are the same height, the main difference being the width, which is an additional 2", will this cause problems? I always thought it was the height that was an issue, not the width.
     
  5. pnewelljr

    pnewelljr Senior member

    Messages:
    470
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
    Unfortunately I don't have much experience with carry on luggage
     
  6. pnewelljr

    pnewelljr Senior member

    Messages:
    470
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Location:
    NYC

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by