Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I

[Thomas]

Man, I got all of my work done for today AND next week!

 

[oneeightyseven]

Originally Posted by j

Sorry about that, folks. One of the tables needed a repair, and it took a really long time. We should be good to go now though.

you nearly killed me

I spent the entire time on the phone with my shrink!!!

 

[Neo_Version 7]

^ That toaster strudel thread brought back some memories, yes?

 

[oneeightyseven]

Originally Posted by Neo_Version 7

^ That toaster strudel thread brought back some memories, yes?

yes. ***** charged me an arm and a leg though; So much for customer loyalty!!

 

[Bhowie]

Next time SF is down just post on Edina's FB wall.

 

[HORNS]

What the hell happened to T4phage??? I looked him up on the member's list, and it doesn't even show when his last activity was.

 

[Huntsman]

Originally Posted by Neo_Version 7

I was seriously looking at Style Forum cached pages on Google.
Yah. Needed a drink recipe of Pio's.

 

[dcg]

blynch's idea in this thread is brilliant:

Originally Posted by blynch

This forum needs a No Bump Reply Button
Then you could flame out newbs to your hearts content without filling up the front page.

Is that even possible?

 

[Stazy]

Dear anal-retentive mods, For the good of humanity can you please switch out the "which" for "that"? Cars which can make Al Gore moist

 

[laphroaig]

According to the current OED, these days either is right. The comma is more important in defining the meaning.

 

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Stazy

Dear anal-retentive mods,

For the good of humanity can you please switch out the "which" for "that"?

Cars which can make Al Gore moist

i made a small amendment to it for your sake.

 

[Matt]

I just saw a thread in Squirrel that linked to some extremely extremely nsfw content, so would like to remind the board that linking to such matter is completely completely not appropriate.

There is no joke funny enough to justify links to hardcore Appreciation, and this has been mentioned several times by mods in the past.

Personally, I thought the person responsible (who has been warned) was lucky to dodge some time in the hole for it. I seriously doubt his luck will carry to the next person who tries it.

 

[Stazy]

Originally Posted by m@T

i made a small amendment to it for your sake.

At least your addition is grammatically correct.

 

[why]

Originally Posted by Stazy

At least your addition is grammatically correct.

The original thread is correct as well; it's just not colloquial.

 

[Stazy]

Originally Posted by why

The original thread is correct as well; it's just not colloquial.

It's correct but its usage is awkward. It is usually recommended that "which" be employed only for non-restrictive clauses. Cars which make Al Gore wet is restrictive so "that" is more appropriate.

[/grammar nazi]