- Joined
- May 30, 2013
- Messages
- 16,761
- Reaction score
- 38,315
This is one of the worst doctrinal positions of all time.We're not fans of drugs of any kind.
We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
This is one of the worst doctrinal positions of all time.We're not fans of drugs of any kind.
There's a pretty good chance the husband is a JW as well.
Your language here is interesting. In the US, at least, all health care is provided with "informed consent" only. It's not the patient's job to "comply" with anyone. People here have the right to turn down health care for any reason or no reason at all, even if it leads to the person's death.
Notfatmuscular enough for young Piob.
Oh, sure, I agree. HC workers definitely don't like/want to work with people who aren't willing to take their advice or make their jobs easier. Informed consent is one of those things that sounds good when you're a first-year law student, but the real world is a lot messier than that. Even so, everyone, at least in theory, has the right to refuse medical care of any kind.
We'll take narcotics if they are prescribed by a physician. We're not fans of drugs of any kind, but if they're medically indicated we're not going to turn them down for religious reasons.
I remember one time I had a traffic ticket of some kind and the woman in front of me was there for going something ridiculous like 85 in a school zone (25MPH). Judge was like: we've suspended your license several times, given you dozens of points and thousands of dollars in fines. I am going to have to sentence you to jail.OPP pull over man banned from driving for life 8 separate times - Toronto | Globalnews.ca
Provincial police say they've charged a man who was allegedly driving despite having eight separate lifetime bans from driving.globalnews.ca
Dude will prolly drive to his court appt.
What's up with some serious jail time?
**** my sister had two duis and the attendant suspensions. One time she got pulled over while suspended AND dui but for whatever reason they didn't test her so she got away with it. But the kicker was that she had some coke in her pocket (miami kind not Atlanta kind) and somehow while cuffed got it out and hidden in the backseat. Anyway lots of times where her life could be ruined by the state instead of just by her.I heard this in court once. Some dumb guy ahead of me.
Judge: You've had 8 DUIs and you are here for driving on a suspended license?
Some dumb guy: yes
Judge: You were released OR?
Some dumb guy: yes
Judge: BAILIFF !!!!
I agree. A transfusion is often a lifesaver. But sometimes people decide they don't want to be saved, for a variety of reasons, and it's their right to refuse treatment.Pretty sure transfusions are medically indicated.
No disagreement here, except for the weird choice of "comply" as a description of a person choosing to accept medical care.But to go back to your earlier point about my choice of words. Believe me, I do choose carefully.
For a patient to "Comply" is to simply be treated for their ailments, and out the door.
Patients who refuse to comply put not just themselves, but others at risk.
Hospital staff just want to do their job and go home to their families.
Was this directed at me? How is this "hitting back"?Time to hit back.
I want to ask, why do you not adopt the old text to modern medicine?