The 2024 Styleforum and Epaulet Alpaca Project
For the third year in a row, we're thrilled to partner with @Epaulet to bring you an exclusive collection of luxurious sweaters, hats, jackets, and blankets in Peruvian Alpaca.
Details can be found here
The Styleforum Team.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
It’s exactly because I find it basic that there is nothing to discuss, and even if it’s expensive clothing, it doesn’t change the fact it still looks very basic.
And I am sorry (got nothing against you) but in both case, I don’t think it looks flattering on you. More balanced outfits would look better.
It’s exactly because I find it basic that there is nothing to discuss, and even if it’s expensive clothing, it doesn’t change the fact it still looks very basic.
And I am sorry (got nothing against you) but in both case, I don’t think it looks flattering on you. More balanced outfits would look better.
idk gun to my head I would wear foo fits over bart's 100% of the time
Not trying to further bash you, but didn’t you spend all this money on your sweatpant fit? You could’ve simply gone to Uniqlo if you wanted to look like a dude going to my local Planet Fitness for the first time.What’s wrong with “basic”?
This is why you guys have developed a penchant for anything with patchwork and whatever-the-f*ck this is:
View attachment 2241383
You’ve confused complexity, strangeness, and forum brand cred for having style. Most of the fits here are like the above (tragically ugly) or mid-beyond-belief (could have copied page 32 from the LL Bean catalogue for $120 all-in but instead bought a bunch of stuff on sale from NMWA for 10x to look exactly the same).
This just in: Three foot investment banker with bad eyesight wearing what look like Jordans and played out skinny jeans calls mysterious souk chic stranger a toddler!I see this toddler silhouette a lot on here. I don’t get it as an aesthetic choice for an adult, but it is adorable I guess.
Should lean in more and swap the boots for booties.
u ok manThis just in: Three foot investment banker with bad eyesight wearing what look like Jordans and played out skinny jeans calls mysterious souk chic stranger a toddler!
Not trying to further bash you, but didn’t you spend all this money on your sweatpant fit? You could’ve simply gone to Uniqlo if you wanted to look like a dude going to my local Planet Fitness for the first time.
You’re not standing out with that fit anymore than the guys you’re calling out, and maybe that’s your intention, but I do think you should size up on the shirt. You’re a smaller guy with very little shape on your torso, so why emphasize that?
Bashing other posters by saying they shop at nmwa to look basic while posting a fit wearing the merz b white t sold by nmwa is very Foo.
This just in: Three foot investment banker with bad eyesight wearing what look like Jordans and played out skinny jeans calls mysterious souk chic stranger a toddler!
I’m not sure that I even understand this comment. The proportions of this are not dissimilar to 80’s Armani. I mean, I like the silhouette of really voluminous pants - they remind me of old aikido uniforms, but this is not even that. The proportions are close to classic.I see this toddler silhouette a lot on here. I don’t get it as an aesthetic choice for an adult, but it is adorable I guess.
Should lean in more and swap the boots for booties.
Are those the Nonnative by Officine Generale side zip boots from a while back? Man, I still kick myself for not having bought a pair then.View attachment 2240831
Geller / Lemaire / Atha / Nonnative