The WAYWT Discussion Thread

[Big Pun]

None of that goes together, the crisp blue and white pants (seersucker?) and the horrendous earth tone sneakers look bad.

 

[Coldsnap]



nice fit tween.
and thanks for that uniqlo premium down fit. picked up XS and fits great.
i love the trash bag look

Yeah, I know I called it a trash bag look but It has grown on me the past two days. I asked for a beige and got a dark green, It's a nice color I guess... Nothing really like it in my wardrobe at the moment.

 

[miran]



 I´ve also had friends who have asked me about the clothes I wear and they act all surprised because of the money I spend on sneakers and jeans (even though some of them make much more money than I do). They´ve also never heard of most of the brands I wear. I´m pretty sure I´m the only guy in all of patagonia (a region in argentina with 5 provinces in it, some as big as some european countries, but with very much, much less population) who knows and owns a pair of KVA or YSL.

For you--

[VIDEO][/VIDEO]

But this one is better

[VIDEO][/VIDEO]

This one belongs in that Iranian artsy thread that Shahinshah posts a lot in.


This one is Styleforum approved:

[VIDEO][/VIDEO]

And finally, this one is MC approved:

[VIDEO][/VIDEO]

 

[Lionheart Biker]

I remember all of those. The first 2 are by far the best. Great finds

 

[the shah]

is it desirable to have sexual orientation questioned -- haow to be asked ?




nuurqlobarrettmiyasuhiro

 

[hendrix]



None of that goes together, the crisp blue and white pants (seersucker?) and the horrendous earth tone sneakers look bad.

I don't want to sound mean, but don't wear these pieces with each other.

why would that be mean?

Fair enough, that seems to be the consensus. Obviously this is very similar to another one of my fits, but the difference seems to be that the pants don't work. Weird since light blue jeans seem to work well, and these pants don't.

 

[Urthwhyte]

^ yeah, nothing wrong with that. just wanted to know your thoughts/opinion on sizing?
lol that reversed placket.
why is there a difference between mens/womens clothes?

As to the first jacket, link? I'm a legit men's 42, so if it doesn't fit 46 it probably fit me

For the placket, buttons are on different side so maids could do it up, AFAIK

 

[reedobandito]



I'm drunk, but this is really, really bad

 

[larryr]

different shoes would fix that up, a more solid sole would balance it out. Something navy/light brown ...

 

[conceptionist]

Agree with the others. You look like a tropical streetwear pimp.

 

[APK]



The pants are the problem. I can't remember them looking good with anything you've posted. They remind me too much of James Cagney pajamas and with the white tee here, the visual is that very much of a lounge outfit not fit for the outside world that you just happened to throw a jacket over.

Playing with pastels is a riskier path to travel down, much more so than wear a lot of black and charcoal. The problem in this instance, I think, is that the overall effort is too garish. That Ervell jacket is a LOUD piece and benefits from more subdued supporting items. Light jeans, as you mentioned, would work. But I don't really see how that leads to the assumption that seersucker pants would work, too. It's a different texture and color, both which kind of command attention on their own.

 

[dnna1]

Thanks for the feedback. I think a lot of the unflattering look of the cardi has to do with the low angle from which it was shot. I love the piece but it is definitely harder to style than I thought it would be due to the low neckline. Still working on that. Maybe wear it open more.

 

[brad-t]



Yes, as someone just said, caring about your apearance will get a stereotype label thrown at you.  The gay label.  Of course, if you're gay, then you can broadcast your StyleForum membership to the world and wait for the dudes to roll in.  If not, you've got a problem.  I think my parents think I'm gay, because whenever I visit them my dad comments that "I look like I put a lot of effort into my clothing," or that "my jeans are kind of tight" or something.  It's pretty scary.

The trick is to look amazing without looking like you tried.  I must say, that's hard to do.

Or you could just, you know, not give a **** that random people think that you are a homosexual.

 

[ManofKent]



The pants are the problem. I can't remember them looking good with anything you've posted. They remind me too much of James Cagney pajamas and with the white tee here, the visual is that very much of a lounge outfit not fit for the outside world that you just happened to throw a jacket over.
Playing with pastels is a riskier path to travel down, much more so than wear a lot of black and charcoal. The problem in this instance, I think, is that the overall effort is too garish. That Ervell jacket is a LOUD piece and benefits from more subdued supporting items. Light jeans, as you mentioned, would work. But I don't really see how that leads to the assumption that seersucker pants would work, too. It's a different texture and color, both which kind of command attention on their own.

+1 - I think the seersucker pants would work with a white oxford and maybe a grey or navy jacket.

 

[RegisDB9]

Teg: I guess I haven't been exposed to that much violence because a du getting raped and then taking a double serrated knife ********** was disturbing. OZ was comical man!


Hendrix: cant go wrong with tropical streetwear pimp