Ibrock
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2009
- Messages
- 166
- Reaction score
- 0
UK 8 in Redwings, they are still a bit big too, so suppose I've got quite small feet for being 6ft3 yea.
Woah, I thought I had small feet for being 6'3 and I'm a 10.5/11.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
UK 8 in Redwings, they are still a bit big too, so suppose I've got quite small feet for being 6ft3 yea.
I'm just sick of modern internet snark-humor. It's not really funny nor biting but just kinda lame most the time. Especially when it's non-stop
gross, but because you're new: the cardigan, or shirt, or both are too big around the waist. I can see it bunching up and creating an ugly mess around your stomach. The horizontal pattern also makes it look like it's pulling, even when it's not, so it's a bad visual effect. Jeans are a matter of taste I guess, I hate the "slim but still hanging straight down with a sharp knee crease" look.
i really dont know why ppl post their faces when they know they look like tools
btw what is with the CUSS spam in MC. It's CUSS this CUSS that. I think I missed the memo
It's been a while.
thats why i think socal looks good in the more tailored/fitted clothes , rather than some of the other costumes he was wearing ,as he looked like he was swimming in them
indesertum;3029012 said:really? edmorel and vox generally crack me up.
btw what is with the CUSS spam in MC. It's CUSS this CUSS that. I think I missed the memo[/QUCUSS is from the fantastic mr fox DUH
thats why i think socal looks good in the more tailored/fitted clothes , rather than some of the other costumes he was wearing ,as he looked like he was swimming in them
If I had your pecs Otter it'd be another thing.
It's an anatomic tight raglan block vs a classic set-in sleeve, cropped rider's jacket with very little darting on my Moto or anything similar. Two very different styles that appeal to different people, I actually didn't like the Julius. It does give almost anyone (and I have 17.5" wide shoulders and a 35.5-36" chest and a natural 28" waist, ie a 46 jacket/44 pants) a flared hip look unintentionally; the natural way of wearing something that tight at the top would be to pair it with a baggy pair of pants, and that is how Julius themselves generally present it; compressed top, flowy bloused pants, compressed boots.