1. I'd like to announce that animated avatars are now available again. You'll have to reload, but they are once more possible.

    We've been doing a ton of work behind the scenes. The site load speed was already under 1/2 of what Huddler's was, on average, and we installed cloudflare, which means that the site should be even faster. A ton more will go on in the weeks and months to come, and some things will be more visibile, and some less.

    Cheers,

    Fok.

    Dismiss Notice

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Brei

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by gdl203, May 20, 2007.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. papa kot

    papa kot Senior member

    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    51
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2012
    The message about Patek, Rolex and JLC is spot on, especially for those who want to do business in Asia.

    Personally, I can care less about the other brands. I would not consider Cartier a watch manufacturer, regardless of how many in-house movements they make unless they can sustain and focus on this business for a long, long time.
     
  2. papa kot

    papa kot Senior member

    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    51
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2012
    Then reach out to Jacek from hqmiltion.com. I am sure he'll be able to find something.
     
  3. Dino944

    Dino944 Senior member

    Messages:
    3,677
    Likes Received:
    1,991
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    Still not a fan of the ROO, even the End of Days Edition. Still there is no denying its iconic in the AP collecting world, and it really got collectors interested in AP's limited editions. Unfortunately, in recent years they have gone crazy releasing limited edition Offshores that seem to commemorate things nearly as uninspiring as opening a new tube of toothpaste. And even with hot models wearing them, Offshores generally do not interest me.

    As for the Double Red SD, what a stunner! Don't deny yourself...that is one hot watch!!!
    Charlize is pure HOTNESS! Still I don't like the DSSD, and I don't like it on her.
    Nice Tank Francaise Chronograph.
    I've never minded the old vintage SD without cyclops, but in a way it does look like something is missing on the DR SD without it. Maybe I'm just so conditioned to seeing that overall look with a cyclops as I've seen more photos and a few Red Subs in person. I've never seen a DR SD in person.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2013
  4. wurger

    wurger Senior member

    Messages:
    2,887
    Likes Received:
    1,226
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Location:
    Sydney

    Yeah, I reckon the GMT is a worthy buy only if you getting the 2 tone version, or if you can to different time zones. A SUB is perfect for every occasion.
     
  5. Dino944

    Dino944 Senior member

    Messages:
    3,677
    Likes Received:
    1,991
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    Entertaining, but a lot of fluff. What does this mean "Next to Rolex, Patek is the top high end brand in the world..." I have been a huge fan of Rolex for years, and I enjoy wearing them, but I've never thought of Rolex and Patek being in the same catagory as top high end brands. Patek, Lange, AP, VC, Piaget, and some JLCs, yes...Rolex I see them in a completely different catagory. I will say one thing I have noticed that was somewhat accurate is that several Cartier owners I know are very artistic (which is something I had not considered until reading the article). While I found the article amusing I thought there was not much value in the article.

    I've owned at least 1 Daytona in some form or other since 1994, and they never fail to put a smile on my face or impress me. I used one as a daily wearer for 5 years, it was dead on accurate (maybe the most accurate watch I ever owned), banged the hell out of it, and sold it for nearly twice what I paid for it when they were nearly impossible to get brand new. Kept some of the money and used the rest to buy another one at list price.

    A quick photo of the last one I purchased new back in 2005.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2013
  6. Dino944

    Dino944 Senior member

    Messages:
    3,677
    Likes Received:
    1,991
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    Sorry, but your statement about Cartier seems groundless or as though you are not very familiar with the brand. Cartier is one of the largest watch manufacturers in the world. Often only out done in production by Rolex. Are you aware they made their first watch before Rolex existed? Cartier has made wrist watches now for more than 100 years and I think they will be in this business for a very long time. I think their choice to employ movements from ETA in many of their main stream watches, is based on their desire to cover a large variety of budgets. However, they make several watches with inhouse movements, and some of their other high end watches have used movements from Piaget, JLC, F.Piguet, and THA.

    If you are faulting them because some of their watches do not use in house movements, IMHO, that's just silly. Is Rolex a real watch manufacturer because their watches are made in house? Oh wait a minute not all of them are made in house, they gave their lesser line of ETA powered watches a different name, Tudor. Oh and don't forget until cal 4130 came out around 2000/2001, all of their chronographs used outsourced movements. In addition, many of their products from the 1930s have cases and movements similar to Gruen, why, because both used the same suppliers. Rolex largely became a company making their watches completely in house by eventually purchasing the suppliers for their cases, bracelets, movements and other components. Nothing wrong with that, I adore Rolex, but one should not forget they haven't not always been a "Manufacturer." Not to mention, some Cartiers are more finely finished than a Rolex (even when not using an inhouse movement). In addition, the Patek, AP, and VC, Breguet, and BP have all used outside sources for their movements, particular chronographs (Patek only recently started making their own chronograph movements). In addition, Omega, Breitling, and IWC until recently all relied heavily on Valjoux 7750s and ETA movements. While I understand the term manufacturer, and that today's collectors prefer watches use inhouse movements when possible, however I don't think that is a measure of a brand's importance in the world of horology, nor do I think you can say Cartier is not a watch manufacturer or is any less of a manufacturer ( than Rolex, AP, Breguet, VC etc), when many great companies still use movements made by outside sources.

    If you don't like Cartier I can accept that, but your statement about not considering them a manufacturer is silly.
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2013
  7. Newcomer

    Newcomer Senior member

    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    

    You know, I certainly understand now where you are coming from when you speak so fondly of the Daytona. It has such a reassuring feel to it! It is definitely something I would purchase down the road. But I tried the whole run of modern Rolexes on today, and that was really the only one that sung to me. The maxi cases on the sub and GMT just did not really feel right. The GMT masked it better, but on my very flat wrist, it just kind of had a pancake feel to it. I really like the look of the Explorer I on me as well, but the hands have always kind of bothered me. The Daytona though... I really do get it. I have never been the strongest advocate of the Daytona, but I think I have changed my mind. I also like the Explorer II and Milgauss, but they definitely did not feel as consistent on the wrist.

    And +1 to whatever you just said about Cartier. Never get between the Dino and his Cartier :fistbump:

    Lovely picture by the way.
     
  8. in stitches

    in stitches Kung Joo Moderator

    Messages:
    68,895
    Likes Received:
    31,016
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    missed a lot of good action today and too tired to properly read all the posts. :(

    wurger, ddd and dbln79, great sots.

    SF/TWAT meetup in nashville. myself, dereks and dcg. yes, that is me with teh donald duck tee shirt and a 112. :)

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2013
  9. Omega Male

    Omega Male Senior member

    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    181
    Joined:
    May 30, 2013
    Location:
    Leafy Surrey
    Very nice. That's my favorite dial.
     
  10. Belligero

    Belligero Senior member

    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Location:
    EUR
    
    I know exactly what you mean, and I came to the same conclusion. As much as I appreciate the quality of the current professional range, I don't like the updated ones on my wrist as much as their predecessors. But the Daytona offers every modern refinement when it comes to the bracelet and the movement, yet retains the original sports-Rolex charm with its classic case contours.

    When I first took an interest in this stuff, it was one of the last ones I could have imagined getting (mostly due to having read the BS that gets circulated on certain forums), but the more I got into the watch thing, the more I came around to Rolex in general and eventually the Daytona in particular. A big part of that was meeting an ex-Patek watchmaker a house party in 2009 who was wearing one with a black dial in steel. He had a very high regard for Rolex, and especially for their 4130 movement; hearing a legitimate expert's opinion drastically changed how I viewed the company. I'm still learning new things, especially from a watchmaker friend of mine who's just returned from their 3-week advanced course in Geneva where they covered the less-common models such as the Oysterquartz.

    I now understand why many experienced collectors (not that I consider myself a collector, I just like wearing 'em) have stated that they'd pick a Daytona of some sort if they had to choose only one watch. I like that it's not something that I have to coddle or stress about wearing, that it goes with anything, and that it's neither too simple nor too complicated — at least for my tastes. Also, it's just kind of fun to wear for some reason. It's probably because I'm rather easily amused, so I like the interactive element of the chronograph function. It's handy for timing espresso shots, for example...

    [​IMG]

    It's maybe not the best choice on a NATO...

    [​IMG]

    ...but the bracelet seems to work OK. Ahh, that's better:

    [​IMG]

    Looking forward to seeing yours if you end up getting one! :cheers:
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2013
  11. wurger

    wurger Senior member

    Messages:
    2,887
    Likes Received:
    1,226
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Location:
    Sydney
    

    Nice shot of the 3 classics
     
  12. wurger

    wurger Senior member

    Messages:
    2,887
    Likes Received:
    1,226
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Location:
    Sydney
    My grandfather has a TT Connie, my mum has a TT Connie, and I have a Omega Constellation Black Dial 35mm. That was before I purchased the DJ and SUB. :slayer:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. mimo

    mimo Pernicious Enabler

    Messages:
    7,388
    Likes Received:
    4,742
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Same old, same old. Well I suppose this is relevant to Wurger and OM anyway: my mother bought this for my father in 1970. If you're sick of seeing it, say a little prayer for my new consultancy gig, and I'll get something else. [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Belligero

    Belligero Senior member

    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Location:
    EUR
    
    That's rather generous of you to say; I didn't even get any entertainment out of it. But at least some good came of the link; I remembered to check whether Jack Forster — someone who does have writing talent — had any new articles. Lo and behold, I found this, which incisively summarizes everything that's wrong with the mindless pap that constitutes a typical watch article:
    [COLOR=0009FF]"I know of no other branch of consumer journalism [than watches] in which (and it gives me no pleasure to say this) the press has so thoroughly abdicated its responsibility to bring some level of critical acuity to the products it covers, and there are a number of reasons for this.[...] Now part of the problem — especially in the United States — is that the whole notion of watches as objects to be taken seriously on any level at all is largely an alien one. Virtually every editor-in-chief of every major consumer publication from the lowest to the highest knows very little about watches and watchmaking; individuals who in every other respect are models of intelligent discernment, who wouldn’t dream of approaching wine, or style, or cars, or architecture, from an uninformed perspective, look at watches with a nervous suspicion (often largely justified, it pains me to say) that not only are they themselves not terribly interested in watches, but their readers aren’t either. Thus we see high end mechanical watches –objects with over 500 years of history in Europe and the USA, and which for much of that time represented one of the most sophisticated syntheses of technology, science, and artistry in the entire course of human history –handled by already overworked fashion or accessories/jewelry editors; the level of sophistication is usually abysmal (all-black is in!) and coverage all too often consists of a single page of watches with only the most superficial relationship with each other piled one atop the other like so much fruit in a basket."[/COLOR] ​
    I was surprised to find the perfect antidote to the mind-numbing effect of AA's vacuous drivel within the same publication. What amazes me is that whoever is in charge of this stuff at Forbes presumably didn't experience any cognitive dissonance (or at least not enough to drop Adams' column) from running the "social peacocking" dreck right after Forster's call for writing standards, design education and discernment in the industry press. The article goes into more detail regarding the drought of journalistic credibility and reasoned critique in the watch industry; it's well worth reading in full. This is what real writing looks like: The Good, The Bad, And The Inexcusable: On Writing About Watches
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2013
  15. Newcomer

    Newcomer Senior member

    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    I will come back to some of the previous statements later which I would like to answer, i.e. Belli's last two posts.

    And Mimo, I am always glad to see pictures of your watch, and of course I am hoping you land your consultancy gig! Good luck!

    But I have an important message: Happy Fourth of July!!

    [​IMG]

    Is there anything more American than blondes, unbridled patriotism, and women eating phallic shaped foods? I think not.

    Edit: to make picture of Kate larger.
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by