Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by gdl203, May 20, 2007.
Looking back when I bought this watch I didnt think about the price much then! I got it as soon as it was available! Now I dont think it was worth 4G's, but I may be wrong! This reads like a keeper for you, congrats
The thicker case, maxi dial with larger plots and larger hands also give it that bigger look as well.
my only issue with some of the larger cased/lugged rolexes, is that i feel the transition from case/lugs to bracelet is a bit harsh, not enough gentle taper. but that is really a nitpick.
Yes, fat hands and markers definitely contribute to the chunkier look.
The Daytona, on the other hand, looks quite a bit more svelte than their other current 40 mm watches, to the point where I could swear the case diameter was a bit smaller.
(photos again for reference)
Spoiler: Warning: Spoiler!
So — being the consummate nerd that I am — I measured the actual size of the watch.
Surprise! In reality, it's just over 38.5 mm at the bezel, which is the widest part of the case assembly excluding the crown guards and lugs. I'm really pleased about that since the classic look with modern features is what drew me to it in the first place; I think it's cool that it's closer to the original 37-ish mm models, and it makes stuffing a three-day power reserve in there all the more impressive.
Any ideas as to why it's referred to as 40 mm by Rolex and everyone else, though?
That's excellent verification work. Glad to know that the Daytona is on the "svelte" side (my own personal preference). I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that the quoted measurement may be for its widest point, including the crown/guards. My Nautilus wears very thin/light but is supposedly 43mm... from ear to ear. Otherwise it's 38mm diagonal, I believe.
Maybe the bezel isn't actualy the widest part? I'm not wearing my Daytona at the moment, but I kind of remember the side of the case is very rounded, not flat as on a Sub/GMT, and I think the case side at its widest point actually protrudes slightly beyond the bezel, while on the Sub/GMT the bezel protrudes a bit beyond the case (which has flat sides).
Take a look at the photos below. The watch appears to rest on the case side (as evidenced by the small shadow between the bezel and the book particularly under the number 80 on the bezel). If the bezel was the widest part of the watch, wider than the case, I would think it would make actual contact with the book.
Now look at this photo. Not quite the same angle in the photo, but it appears to be resting on its bezel.
One more example of a Daytona where the bezel does not appear to be touching the book thats under it.
Not 100% conclusive, but maybe those of you wearing a Daytona today can take a closer look at the sides of the case and or take some photos.
It's because it's tilted. When held 90° to a straight edge, you can see that the bezel is exactly the same diameter as the case. No camera with me at the moment, unfortunately, but I can get some science-ey photos using a caliper later. I mentioned my nerd-ish tendencies earlier, yes?
I would agree.
The bezel on the Sub does in fact stick out further from it's case however.
I thought about the tilt. I look forward to your results with calipers. Also, maybe you could take a photo from the side with bracelet hanging down, and dial facing upward so we can see a profile of the edge of the bezel and where it sits in relation to the case side (without the crown/pushers).
What do you think of speculations about a SS ceramic bezel Daytona? I came across some mockups online and was pretty intrigued.
I do think the market is anticipating some "improvements" for the next Daytona as the secondary market for SS 116520s is tanking. Looking at rolexforums and Timezone, you see BNIB new serial, open warranty examples going for about $11-11.5k, LNIB with warranty for $10-10.5k, with new listings every day. Could not have imagined this % drop below retail when I was considering a Daytona in 2008-2009.
I'm not truly in love with the rose gold version with ceramic bezel. If they built a SS version, I'd hope it would have a bezel more like on the original manual winds, whereby its an insert set into a metal holder. Whether Rolex will do it, who knows. There is always lots of speculation and only Rolex knows what its plans are.
Rolex only makes a profit from original sales, not from the used market so the secondary market is largely irrelevant for them. It only factors in that the idea that at one time you could buy a Daytona and flip it the same day caused people to buy it even if they really didn't need or want a chronograph. However that helped create interest in the watch from would be speculators and often kept these watches out of the hands of people that really wanted to owned one. As for the Daytona having tanked, its only partially true... in that you can't buy one and flip it for a profit the next day. It still has excellent resale value. Do we consider Submariners and GMT Masters failures because for years you could always walk into an ADs and find them in the case and if you bought it, and sold it the next day it would sustain some depreciation?
We have come to expect that Daytonas would always sell for over list price on the secondary market, but that was changed with an economic downturn around 2008, Rolex has steadily increased its price (to cut out middlemen/speculators...if I were making something, I'd want to max out on the profit rather than leave it to middlemen), and the watch has been in production now for 12+ years so there is a good supply in the used market. We forget that until the early 90s, Daytonas (which had been in production since around 1962/63) were really not popular, were heavily discounted, and anyone that bought them did so to wear them, not because it was easy flip for a profit.
I know that in some parts of the world Daytonas are still difficult to locate. So on some level it really depends where you live. Now we see far more people posting that "They got the call" (from their AD). So I think for true collectors its been a good thing that they are easier to obtain, sadly prices are much higher but only because they were always grossly underpriced. It will be interesting to see what changes if any are shown at Basel.
Fascinating pricing. As I mentioned a few pages back, I'm looking at the 116520 and my AD is offering me one for $12K. Not so bad given these secondary market options, 'no?
Johan, I think is lamenting that there is any price drop at all. Years ago Daytonas were grossly underpriced, and the supply particularly when they were relying on Zenith for El Primero movement to modify was far short of demand. Hence on an average day back in say 1995/1996 you could by a steel 16520 Daytona for say $3850 (before the the next price increase when it went to $4,350) and you could sell it the same day for $7,500-$8,000. You could even wear it for 4-5 years, get it serviced and sell it for nearly twice what you paid. Then as prices approached the $5,500 to $6,000 in the used market you could sell it for $8,500-9,000. When I got one of the early 116520s in 2001 for $6,000 I got an insurance appraisal from a gray market shop (since list price was not its accurate value), the owner of the shop had not seen one in person yet and told me they are selling for $12,000, and wrote the appraisal accordingly.
Once list priced got to $9,000-9,500 fewer people could afford them, they had been in production for several years and then with the economic slump of 2008/09 prices got soft on the secondary market and people couldn't flip them the same day for a profit. Still resale is quite good, you can't buy a Sub, GMT, Milgauss, Explorer etc and sell it the same or next day without experiencing some depreciation.
That's an amazing history of the resulting equilbrium price given fluctuating supply and demand.
Yeah, I don't think I'll be focused on resale value per se. I'm looking for a good, reliable, tough chronograph, great workmanship and aesthetics. I don't want to be a sucker and overpay for it, so I'll try to get one for a good price given attendant support (warranty, relationship with AD or grey market dealer, etc) - but I intend to use it and enjoy it.
Separate names with a comma.