- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 26,710
- Reaction score
- 9,853
I take issue with his repeated attempts to define virtue objectively based on his exact subjective preferences or qualities. I don’t take any issue with nerds looking to learn more about style (for ***** sake, I’ve been posting here almost 15 years) nor do I take issue with people who go about it in other ways.
Yet, you are perfectly fine declaring that Kris Kross has effortless style without substantiation or validation or more generally that style does not benefit from effort or education. It’s all there in your original post.
Of course, I seek to define aesthetic and stylistic virtue. That goes to the very foundation of why we’re all here. But certain folks would rather be the ones dictating the narrative.
Am I wrong? Then why are you in “The Watch Appreciation Thread” without anything to say or share about watches?
Last edited: