- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 26,705
- Reaction score
- 9,841
Where do you separate the two? Aren't they both?
I don’t think he actually wants to talk about it.
We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Where do you separate the two? Aren't they both?
I take it you don't care for the Pitti Peacocks . . .Third, a watch is just one small component of your style. Even if every such component were in fact boring, the whole might still be very pleasing and interesting. In fact, as with any other accessory, often the more interesting and eye-grabbing unto itself, the more detrimental to the overall good.
Well? A watch is a functional jewellery piece. both to serve as an appliance and as an item of personal flamboyance. Even if it's Quartz.I don’t think he actually wants to talk about it.
Rumor has it all that I have to do is post a box pic. It happened.
View attachment 1594582
I guess?
But the whole design just rubs me the wrong way. Comes across more as a water-themed watch than a watch for going into the water, where you’d want maximum contrast and legibility, not a wave-textured blue dial and skeletonized hands.
I take it you don't care for the Pitti Peacocks . . .
Well? A watch is a functional jewellery piece. both to serve as an appliance and as an item of personal flamboyance. Even if it's Quartz.
Change the bracelet. Most people change it to the 1861 Speedmaster style bracelet that has a slight taper.My Seamaster that I showed (the best variant in my opinion) doesn’t have the wave dial. It’s a great looking watch. The skeletonized hands in person aren’t distracting at all. The biggest issue in my opinion is the band, which definitely is what it is. It’s not as bad as a jubilee, though.
I picked it as one of my two watch collection because it’s the most practical knock around steel sports watch I own. I don’t dig Rolex, so I don’t own one. And I couldn’t/wouldn’t wear either of my Overseas to the beach or working outside or to the range.
Rumor has it all that I have to do is post a box pic. It happened.
View attachment 1594582
Didn't you sell one of these last year?Boooooooriiiiiinggg.
View attachment 1594608
Didn't you sell one of these last year?
Boooooooriiiiiinggg.
View attachment 1594608