Lol lucky. I’d love to have a royal oak.I'm slowly lowering my sleeve to cover up my Royal Oak... in my defense though I bought my Royal Oak right before they become really popular and was able to get a 22% discount on mine.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Lol lucky. I’d love to have a royal oak.I'm slowly lowering my sleeve to cover up my Royal Oak... in my defense though I bought my Royal Oak right before they become really popular and was able to get a 22% discount on mine.
1200 meter dives ? Forget 1200 meters, do people actually dive 10-30m wearing their Rolex ?Well, it has to be said, any watch that is handy for 1200m+ dives is not an everydayer, particularly if you are in a custom shirt cuff. I know my dress shirts could not contain more than a 11-12mm high wristwatch.
Supposedly the model I am interested in is forecasted to come in March and I am at the top of the list. I have a feeling that is what they tell everyone.Lol lucky. I’d love to have a royal oak.
Their collections generally are not interesting because they are composed of the "greatest hits." "Here's my Royal Oak, my Nautilus, and my vintage Rolex Daytona."
I was thinking the same thing. Don‘t get me wrong - I love the SD and have an older one myself, but it seems that most people go for a Sub / GMT / Daytona first.
So what do you wanna see? They're classics for a reason, and it's not just about the watches. Most of the time, there's a story attached that make it more interesting than just a greatest hit.
I'm slowly lowering my sleeve to cover up my Royal Oak... in my defense though I bought my Royal Oak right before they become really popular and was able to get a 22% discount on mine.
Can anyone explain the appeal of Hodinkee outside of being just another forum/article site(now grey dealer)? They seem to have or drive hype like its Supreme for adults. I know older forums like TZ are probably dead or are not what they once were, but I honestly don't get Hodinkee outside of they capitalized on social media early on and seemingly garnered a large audience. Genuinely curious as I don't venture out into watch forums much anymore unless a collector friend sends me an article or something.
I agree, but the question becomes, what would you want to see instead? Personally, I have almost no interest in seeing a TW full of watches I could buy myself. I want to see unique, high end stuff, not pedestrian watches that "anyone" could buy. Nor do I want to see a bunch of vintage junk. That stuff just doesn't interest me.
This is my view exactly. One of my favorite TW episodes features now-retired baseball player Howie Kendrick, whose collection is composed of modern and vintage, heavy hitters and more pedestrian watches, all of which support his interest in tool watches.I'm more interested in people's thought patterns on things. If I want to see pics of pretty independent brand watches, there are plenty of sources online for that. I'm most interested in people who collect with intention, who can explain with reason why they've gone after something (assuming its something other than just because they knew it was a cool piece to have), even if it's some more pedestrian pieces.
Yeah, agreed. I also like the fact that the SD (as well as the ND Sub) comes only one way. With the Sub Date, it comes in SS, two-tone & full gold, along with dial variations. The SD seems „purer,“ though I am sure many will disagree with me on that. With that said, I‘d totally rock a YG Sub if I could afford one!Even historically when the SD was 40mm. its additional thickness and cost over a Sub Date always resulted in a stronger demand for Subs (or GMTs), and that was when the price difference in the 90's was only $300 more. Demand for Subs has continued to be stronger than for modern SDs particularly as diameter and price increased significantly. The SD is a great watch, but not everyone can wear a 43mm watch and not everyone wants to spend what it costs for additional water resistance, since it probably won't see anything deeper than a swimming pool.
I find this much more interesting as well. I like the idea of a collection being more than just an accumulation of nice pieces. The thought process, wether it’s a certain watches provenance, history, elements of design or particular movements makes for better discussion. Wealthy celebs/athletes buying high dollar pieces based on hype, or worse, for show couldn’t be more boring.I'm more interested in people's thought patterns on things. If I want to see pics of pretty independent brand watches, there are plenty of sources online for that. I'm most interested in people who collect with intention, who can explain with reason why they've gone after something (assuming its something other than just because they knew it was a cool piece to have), even if it's some more pedestrian pieces.
I find this much more interesting as well. I like the idea of a collection being more than just an accumulation of nice pieces. The thought process, wether it’s a certain watches provenance, history, elements of design or particular movements makes for better discussion. Wealthy celebs/athletes buying high dollar pieces based on hype, or worse, for show couldn’t be more boring.