- Joined
- Mar 7, 2002
- Messages
- 13,952
- Reaction score
- 10,061
I'm pretty sure Rolex ceased to be a tool watch with the five-digit references (glossy dial, white gold surrounds).
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I'm pretty sure Rolex ceased to be a tool watch with the five-digit references (glossy dial, white gold surrounds).
OK, I change my vote. That watch is just insanely good-looking. I much prefer the classic metal bezel to the ceramic one.
Eh, they still work fine for me; I regularly do stuff like skiing, swimming and diving with 4-, 5- and 6-digit references.I'm pretty sure Rolex ceased to be a tool watch with the five-digit references (glossy dial, white gold surrounds).
I remember someone, maybe on here, saying that a tool watch in precious metal is a watch for tools.
Thanks! I also still prefer the thinner hour markers of the 5 digit Daytonas, although the larger lum plots are more functional on the later Daytonas.OK, I change my vote. That watch is just insanely good-looking. I much prefer the classic metal bezel to the ceramic one.
I always liked their coverage on new releases for BW and SIHH. It was convenient to see the big brand releases on one site along with detailed descriptions. Other than that, I don't really read the site anymore.They were always quite deferential — it’s impossible to find a critical review — but the shift to straight-up advertorials really got underway about four or five years ago when they partnered up with tech money and started releasing their own branded editions with some of the watch companies.
Ironically, their most obsequious ass-kisser is Jack Forster, who once lamented the “toothless” state of watch writing.
The Good, The Bad, And The Inexcusable: On Writing About Watches
"What?" --Customs Agent, JFK, On Hearing The Words, "Watch Journalist" After spending nearly fifteen years looking at watches as an enthusiast, and seven writing about them full time, I'm still not comfortable outright panning a watch –operating on the assumption that if you don't have anything...www.forbes.com
I’m not sure how bad the current state is, since I haven’t checked their site in a long time. The reference points series is probably still great; they did an impressive one on the Submariner a year or two ago if I recall correctly.
At least the 2 AD's I work with have never mentioned "paying above MSRP" for a Rolex.
One will ship out of state for me and the other flatly refuses.
I would be curious to know just what the Rolex policy is for discounting from MSRP, as I was offered -5% in Macau in December, while nothing in Hong Kong... I would be too scared to entertain the idea of even mentioning to an AD here...
One is super Anal about removing all protective stickers and will not even include the bezel protector, claiming that is is Rolex policy. All sees a little arbitrary IMHO...
"Talking Watches" has always been the best part of Hodinkee for me.
Agreed, though honestly I love a good fish stick and baked beans. Depending on who at the other half of the candy bar, I'm also open to negotiation.I've enjoyed some of those episodes. Although, I find Hodinkee in general sort of hit or miss. Also, the emails I get from them about new arrivals in their vintage watch department are sort of a joke. Even when I open them immediately, almost anything they post that is interesting or from Rolex, PP, VC, etc is already sold. It's like going to a restaurant, and being given a menu with last night's specials: lobster, fillet mignon, and chocolate lava cake, and then being told all they have left to serve you tonight is a frozen fish sticks, baked beans, and half eaten candy bar.