Desi
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
- Messages
- 2,249
- Reaction score
- 407
BTW I would have gone with:
ewwww that is not a flattering angle.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
BTW I would have gone with:
ewwww that is not a flattering angle.
I think she's one of the few girls that looks just as good either way.Seberg was an attractive lady but you guys going on about how short hair is more flattering are taking crazy pills. Just compare and contrast. Here she is with slightly longer hair ( once could only imagine her with a full mane) and she blows away the version of her with short hair.
I could go into it at length but in a nutshell, with the proliferation of the internet into our everyday lives our current cultures content gets diluted through the stream of constant updates, blog and forum posts, news articles, youtube videos, etc...
When wide leg and flares "come back," they will not resemble what the average fucktard looks like currently when shuffling around through Ross Discount looking for tube socks. It will be something that looks right, and we will be ready for it.
Anyone who wants a current alternative to slim looks should consider the narrow ankle/drop crotch plus drapey top. Some are making that work right now.
Seberg was an attractive lady but you guys going on about how short hair is more flattering are taking crazy pills. Just compare and contrast. Here she is with slightly longer hair ( once could only imagine her with a full mane) and she blows away the version of her with short hair.