1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

The perfect tuxedo except for one thing...

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by shnikies, Dec 3, 2012.

Tags:
  1. Loathing

    Loathing Senior member

    Messages:
    1,093
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Location:
    London
    I don't have a problem with you, as I thought I'd made clear.

    I do have a bit of a problem with the way you sometimes proffer your theories as if they're canon law; and when someone disputes one such theory, you almost invariably call them obtuse, or insinuate the same (as you just did to me). (Which is what if not an ad hom attack?) Surely you're aware of how the peg on which you hang your weighty theories is sometimes very fragile and spurious indeed?

    I'm not going go further because, frankly, fuck citing specific examples and having an argument over nothing. All I'm saying: a little humility, please.
     
  2. Loathing

    Loathing Senior member

    Messages:
    1,093
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Location:
    London
    Also, I love how on the one hand you argue vehemently that your personal life is irrelevant, and on the other hand can't resist putting scare quotes around "better"!
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2013
  3. archetypal_yuppie

    archetypal_yuppie Senior member

    Messages:
    2,877
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    

    Tirade? Ha.

    Calling it like I see it, and even if ad hominem far from irrelevant to the subject being discussed.
     
  4. archetypal_yuppie

    archetypal_yuppie Senior member

    Messages:
    2,877
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    

    Mind you, the thread was being constructively debated, until you jump in with something as openminded (haha) as the above. Are you suprised you trigger arguments, or that a certain % of us don't like you?

    You say its ridiculous, you say it's not up for debate, you call a subset of the membership (does not include me) freaks, you say they're not relevant. Great attitude, really welcoming, not superior or aloof at all.

    Then you act as though someone saying (me):
    // You can dress up your statements as fancily as you like, but it sounds so much like "Paul Stuart and Brooks and Bond etc is stupid, but Rubinacci is good! I wear Rubinacci! I am good!" //
    Was some drastic offense?

    Anyway, I'm sure you'll be able to come back with some retort, but you should look inward. Don't kid yourself. I hugely prefer to avoid this nonsense but, but tire of seeing you bully people.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2013
    1 person likes this.
  5. mafoofan

    mafoofan Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,795
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    

    Clearly, you do have a problem with me. When the fuck did I insinuate you were obtuse? I was addressing your false characterization of me, which had nothing to do with anything other than the fact you wanted to unleash your pent-up bitterness. Apparently, you don't believe it's my place to question you, as you seem to find it intrinsically offensive. So, yes, some humility would be appreciated.


    You know what, you do have to be stricken with a special sort of prejudice or idiocy to confuse questioning another person's ad hominem comment as ad hominem itself. What happened to your "better" education?

    To spell it out more plainly, since you seem to need it that way, the poster I was speaking to had responded to your commentary insinuating that I use my education as some sort of premise in argument. He chimed in that he happened to be one of the sorts that disprove my supposed claim to educational superiority. Hence, he introduced the question of his education into the discussion. Not me. See how that works? Not once in this thread, or any other, have I used my schooling to make a point. You introduced it here. The other poster picked it up. I called you out on it.

    You will no doubt accuse me of speaking condescendingly to you. And I am. But the record clearly shows it is not unprovoked and not initiated on my end.
     
  6. bboysdontcryy

    bboysdontcryy Senior member

    Messages:
    1,320
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Location:
    London
    Frankly, objectively speaking, Foo is right on that specific count, and I really think that, today, there's no real debate about whether to have a single vent or not on a dinner jacket. Logically speaking, I'm not convinced that the remarks about vents is a metaphor for 'but Rubinacci is good! I wear Rubinacci! I am good!". He does give a credible example by comparing bespoke clothing to RTW, and it might be the inherent nature of such a comparison that necessarily throws into sharp relief the distinction between the clothes snob and the average Joe the plumber who doesn't give two hoots (or cannot afford to do so), and thus, invokes a sense of 'class' if you will.

    However, I do agree that Foo could try to put his remarks through more tactfully
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2013
    2 people like this.
  7. VinnyMac

    VinnyMac Senior member

    Messages:
    1,868
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
  8. mafoofan

    mafoofan Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,795
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    

    I reasoned with you why single vents are bad. I reasoned with you that your approach, which was to validate anything on the basis that it has been done before, was hopelessly destructive to the very notion of black tie. I didn't throw down a fucking commandment. It is plain as day in my commentary. Yet, you resorted to re-characterizing my arguments as disgustingly snobby assertions of superiority. So don't fucking tell me to look inward. You picked a fight with me and you got one.
     
  9. Flake

    Flake Senior member

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    

    Yeah :embar:
     
  10. Locke42

    Locke42 Active Member

    Messages:
    40
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    This is the most sophisticated language I've ever seen used in an Internet nerdrage war. [​IMG]
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. archetypal_yuppie

    archetypal_yuppie Senior member

    Messages:
    2,877
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    

    Haha. You're so ridiculous.
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. JubeiSpiegel

    JubeiSpiegel Senior member

    Messages:
    5,382
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Location:
    Sartorial Wasteland
    Can we DT this thread now... :confused:
     
    2 people like this.
  13. Loathing

    Loathing Senior member

    Messages:
    1,093
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Location:
    London
    

    The record of the conversation between you and me shows you initiating the ad hominem by implying that I'm too stupid to understand the pretentious bollocks you wrote once about Modernist furniture. You wrote:
    Sure, I initiated the conversation, but I was acerbically criticizing your theory, not you. Your response was, for all intents and purposes, to call me obtuse. I can take an insult, but I thought it would be fun to treat you with your own medicine, by launching a blindside into your education and intelligence. It's not nice to be condescended to, is it? You then erupted into a tirade of butt-hurt, which included another series of remarks about my low intelligence; e.g.:
    ,
    and,
    .

    Now, frankly, I don't mind your insults. Fire away. I'm a big boy. But, I was simply calling out a perennial feature of your arguments on SF: you call people idiots when they disagree with you; or if they're lucky, you just patronize them as if they're somehow worse than you. Maybe it's the product of your macho profession and the dog-eat-dog city in which you live.

    In any case, it comes across badly, and it absolutely detracts from my opinion of your stylishness. Since you're here in pursuit of style, I thought I might point that out to you. Alas, in a moment of foolish confidence I thought you might deign to listen to my opinion. I still think my point is valid, but you may as well disregard it since I'm such a lowly cretin. (Oh wait, isn't than an ad hominem fallacy?)
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2013
    1 person likes this.
  14. TimelesStyle

    TimelesStyle Senior member

    Messages:
    2,007
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    I think this thread calls for the creation of another thread:

    "Best leather gloves for challenging another member to a duel"

    My vote will be for Bloomingdale's house brand, but invariably someone will insist on thousand dollar Hermes gloves for this purpose...
     
  15. Flake

    Flake Senior member

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    

    In green, no doubt. But we can't talk about that at this time. They would be perfect for pistols at dawn. :nodding:
     
  16. TimelesStyle

    TimelesStyle Senior member

    Messages:
    2,007
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    

    For that you'd have to refer to the "dress gun" section of the "state of black tie" thread.

    Not sure I'd go with green on this; I feel as though they should be black or brown, but perhaps a neutral color suede, almost like a gardening glove would do. Sticking to whatever I find on sale, though, since I may not live to use them twice.
     
  17. bertie

    bertie Senior member

    Messages:
    808
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Location:
    North of
    If these are the first dueling gloves then i would suggest navy or charcoal. Green is very advanced and tough to coordinate.
     
    2 people like this.
  18. TimelesStyle

    TimelesStyle Senior member

    Messages:
    2,007
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    

    And something that wears in well; if you tend to win duels then you'll have some very worn in patches from the gloves slapping across the face of others.
     
  19. bertie

    bertie Senior member

    Messages:
    808
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Location:
    North of
    Perhaps shell instead of calf? Peccary would be too fine.

    Do you think we could ask for a duel emoticon? This might save a LOT of time.
     
  20. TimelesStyle

    TimelesStyle Senior member

    Messages:
    2,007
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    

    Excellent, excellent call! A glove going back and forth perhaps?
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by