STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
there are few things worse in life than a mouth full of unexpected wine sediment
regarding decanting and price, I really don't think there is a connection. I have in my "cellar" a few cases of $10-$15 wine that I routinely decant for at least an hour--I think it needs the air. This is especially true of Madiran.
I had a 2009 bord last night with a ton of sediment. Though I decant more to open up the flavors in the wine and less about sediment. Sediment is a easy thing to avoid getting in a glass if you just pay attention.
Both very good. The Klee Pinot I thought was amazing for a whooping $20. Definitely a good value. The Red Newt was new to me, but what I thought was really cool was this little chart on the back and goes along with a recent conversation about residual sugar labeling...
Well it was a 44 year old wine! More importantly, it was, not surprisingly, deader than Julius Caesar.the fill level on that '68 has me a little
Fill is totally fine for a 68. Sorry to hear it wasn't so good though.
Was flipping through the channels on a TV at the gym and caught Gail Simmons on some no-name daytime talk show. She was blind tasting cheap and expensive versions of some varietals. She ended up picking (with a strong preference) an $8 Trader Joe's Sauvignon Blanc over Silex. Wasn't sure whether to or
She alos picked Two Buck Chuck over some pricey Cab Sauv I'd never heard of. (Maybe she had some sort of deal with TJ's.)