The Official RRL Thread

Discussion in 'Streetwear and Denim' started by whodini, May 21, 2009.

  1. tv2177

    tv2177 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    62
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    
    i think it might a little too baggy, but if that's what u intended to do then i guess its fine.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2011


  2. tv2177

    tv2177 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    62
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    

    good find for those nice pictures. that new site is still unfix and annoys me to stay there for another second.
     


  3. Teger

    Teger Senior member

    Messages:
    21,962
    Likes Received:
    6,608
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    i don't really agree about the slim fit being that slim - it's really not, especially compared to brands like APC
     


  4. grundletaint

    grundletaint Senior member

    Messages:
    5,216
    Likes Received:
    397
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007


  5. RRL CLOTHING

    RRL CLOTHING Senior member

    Messages:
    1,026
    Likes Received:
    100
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    ^ I really like your fit on the low straight rinse jeans. Did you size down a lot?

    The fits on the fitguide all look great, especially the slim bootcut which barely looks bootcut at all. Which wash is that?
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2011


  6. grundletaint

    grundletaint Senior member

    Messages:
    5,216
    Likes Received:
    397
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Gracias. Just sized down one from 32 to 31. They were snug, not tight, initially. Looks like it's in line with what their intended fit is vs. My 30s, which are on the skinny side
     


  7. tv2177

    tv2177 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    62
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    

    I agree. i tried on both 32x32 APC NS and RRL Slim fit, to me APC felt slimmer to me.
     


  8. edubs01

    edubs01 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    55
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Location:
    Philly
    Trying to decide betwen the following shirts.

    Thoughts???

    [ATTACHMENT=639]1.PNG (475k. PNG file)[/ATTACHMENT]
    [ATTACHMENT=640]2.PNG (291k. PNG file)[/ATTACHMENT]
    [ATTACHMENT=641]4.PNG (409k. PNG file)[/ATTACHMENT]
     


  9. Froosh

    Froosh Senior member

    Messages:
    1,157
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    

    E.D., RRL site is unnavigable for me so thank you for posting this! Hard to tell the difference between the low straight and straight in those pics, only notice a difference in rise.
     


  10. Saturdays

    Saturdays Senior member

    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    111
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    

    All 3 look nice, personally I would go for the 1st or 2nd.
     


  11. grundletaint

    grundletaint Senior member

    Messages:
    5,216
    Likes Received:
    397
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    

    i wish the fucking thing (and the rest of the lookbook) were in color.
     


  12. el duderino

    el duderino Senior member

    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    

    That makes no sense. A 32 Slim Fit has a leg opening of about 7.75", whereas NS has 8". In addition, the rise is totally different with the NS having close to 2" higher rise than slim fits which would throw off the comparison.

    If you want to compare to APC, compare the NS to Low Straight and NC to Slim Fit. My statement of them being slim is relative to the whole RRL line where all their other pants are based off either regulation/officer chino cuts. Compared to those, it's a noticeable difference.



    The main problem is they are using all different guys in each fit.

    If you downsize 3 on straight legs vs 2 on the Low Straights, they look very close. In the same size, the current straight legs have about .75 - 1" more room in the thigh/lower leg compared to the Low Straights
     


  13. dmashita

    dmashita Member

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Is the Slim Bootcut comparable to the Slim fit in the thigh and knee area with only a slight flare from the knees down? In the fit pic above, the flare looks pretty pronounced in the side view pic.
     


  14. grundletaint

    grundletaint Senior member

    Messages:
    5,216
    Likes Received:
    397
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    here's something i previously posted but it's been buried.

    i sized down 2 on both of these, from 32 to 30. both are 30x32 one washes on the same guy (me). keep in mind the straight legs had been worn and soaked while the lows are fresh outta the box.

    the low straights in the same size were waaaaaay tighter in the top block and thigh and you can see the taper on the LS. my low straights sized down 1 (31) (from a page or 2 back) were much closer in fit to the straight legs down 2 (30).


    here is a link to the original post with various sizes and cuts

    it's post 3970. i can't get this damn hyperlink to work right


    straight legs are on top, low straights on bottom

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2011


  15. dmashita

    dmashita Member

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    grundletaint, so you wear a 30/31 in Low Straight but a 32 in Slim Bootcut? Are the Slim Bootcut not vanity sized as well (a tagged 32 actually measures 32")?
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by