The Official NFL Thread: 2012-13 Season

Discussion in 'Entertainment, Culture, and Sports' started by jrd617, Aug 11, 2012.

  1. Gibonius

    Gibonius Senior member

    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    4,250
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Location:
    Suburban Sprawl Sector 3, Maryland
    

    All the delays are not very interesting.
     


  2. Reynard369

    Reynard369 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,313
    Likes Received:
    40
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Location:
    Suburbia
    
    True dat.
     


  3. Rambo

    Rambo Senior member

    Messages:
    27,312
    Likes Received:
    1,617
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Location:
    I'M IN MIAMI, BITCH
    Why the fuck would the officials cave in at this point? Shit, if I was them I'd be holding out for MORE. Its clearly obvious they have a valuable commodity that can't be purchased elsewhere.
     


  4. retronotmetro

    retronotmetro Senior member

    Messages:
    1,645
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    

    I heard this morning that the spread between the two sides was $32K per team, per year. If that is true, this is a ridiculous war of billionaire egos vs union knuckleheads.
     


  5. Douglas

    Douglas Stupid ass member

    Messages:
    14,658
    Likes Received:
    2,291
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Purseforum
    Source? I can virtually guarantee this is not true. No business owner is that dumb.
     


  6. denning

    denning Senior member

    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    167
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    My understanding is that it is not the money issue, but rather the ref's pensions that is causing this whole kerfuffle. The owners want to move to a 401(k) style of pension and the refs don't want to. Also, the owners want to hire something like 10-15 more refs, but not increase the salary pool for the refs, thereby decreasing each of their salaries.

    However, it is the pension issue that is really the problem.
     


  7. denning

    denning Senior member

    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    167
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    Also best line of the night last night: "Russell Wilson is the only quarterback in the history of the NFL to throw a game-winning interception."
     


  8. HORNS

    HORNS Senior member

    Messages:
    15,186
    Likes Received:
    3,053
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Location:
    Waiting for Saturday to Come
    



    ...
     


  9. denning

    denning Senior member

    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    167
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    Damnit.
     


  10. edmorel

    edmorel Quality Seller!! Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    25,724
    Likes Received:
    3,386
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    NYC


  11. retronotmetro

    retronotmetro Senior member

    Messages:
    1,645
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    May 5, 2004

    I think the person I heard discussing the matter was confusing the dollars per year with dollars over the life of the CBA. Either way it is a trivial amount of money, all things considered.
     


  12. Douglas

    Douglas Stupid ass member

    Messages:
    14,658
    Likes Received:
    2,291
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Purseforum
    Yes, it does sound pretty trivial, if that's the gist of it.

    But even the article admits some of the divide is philosophical, and not just money - e.g. the full-time issue and the "bench" issue.

    Also bear in mind that many of the NFL's full-time emps don't have pension, so sometimes even small monetary issues have larger monetary issues lurking in the shadows.

    But yes, it does appear that at least some of this is down to short-sighted stubbornness. Thankfully, it looks like the debacle on Monday may have woken a few people up. For Christ's sakes, I bet the Ravens spent half of $100 grand on *fireworks* before the game on Sunday night.
     


  13. HORNS

    HORNS Senior member

    Messages:
    15,186
    Likes Received:
    3,053
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Location:
    Waiting for Saturday to Come
    Well, what is "full time" in an industry where you only play 16 games? I agree that the differences are philosophical and that will change soon enough because we ALL see how important refs are to the game. And then again maybe we do but the owners/Goodell will continue to think otherwise.
     


  14. edmorel

    edmorel Quality Seller!! Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    25,724
    Likes Received:
    3,386
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    NYC
    

    yeah, the NFL always takes a hard line in these negotiations and the issue is not just the 100K but rather what lurks in the shadows after they agree to the 100K. The other issue though that they should keep their eye on is, at what point does the NFL suffer monetary damage that is much greater than what they will give up to the refs. A couple of ratings points lower, a few less seats filled etc means a lot more to them than 100K and you hope that the negotiations don't get "personal" where either party decides to cut off its nose to spite its face. I can't remember the last time there was this much disgust with one of the pro leagues, much less the NFL and whether the league is right or not, you'd be hard pressed to find someone to side with the owners on this one. This isn't billionaire owners going up against millionaire players, its owners going against "working class" refs (who make over 100K for part time work, get pensions and are looking for double digit raises :wow:)
     


  15. Ambulance Chaser

    Ambulance Chaser Senior member

    Messages:
    9,834
    Likes Received:
    954
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2002
    Location:
    Washington, D.C.
    ESPN is reporting that a deal is close, possibly allowing the regular referees to return this week. Please let it be.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by