T4phage
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2003
- Messages
- 5,973
- Reaction score
- 671
destroyed kudu
what are these?
destroyed kudu
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
what are these?
No they do not, but the differences are quite small in terms of profile. There is one version with an inner toe-cap (so slightly more structured) and one without.
And speaking of Guidi, I haven't posted this group shot yet:
Ankle boot (994) in Donkey / Mid boot (995) in Reverse Kangaroo / Back-zip boot (988MS) in F.G. Horse
Via suspensionpoint.ca
So they all have that really blunted look when viewed from above?
That was my exact concern with Guidi. But the toe box looks completely normal when they are on It would appear that in photos it is exaggerated due possibly to lack of scale. I think it's important to remember that Guidi runs narrow so the toe box while round is not enormous since it is on a narrower platform. One thing I have found (with Guidi back zips in particular) is that if your feet are wide at all then it's possible for the ball of your foot to protrude and give a very bizarre appearance. This would be the only thing I would worry about with Guidi. I haven't found that to be a problem with the 995 or the 16.
I've ordered 988 with toe cap to keep the original shape of the toe box (not MS) from PNP and Luigi told me that MS doesn't have toe cap.
So they all have that really blunted look when viewed from above?
Also, those kangaroo boots look awesome.