epc2
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2013
- Messages
- 586
- Reaction score
- 273
Very nice, Are the LWB from DC or NY? Thanks.
Last edited:
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Very nice, Are the LWB from DC or NY? Thanks.
I should have specified, sorry.Very nice, Are the LWB from DC or NY?
Thanks.
If you like the Harlech, this thread may be of interest.
http://www.styleforum.net/t/362536/crockett-jones-modified-brown-cordovan-harlech-mto
If you like the country boot style with blobby lasts that make the barrie seem sleek in comparison then Tricker's are for you. The AS country boots aren't bad but the country boot is Tricker's bread and butter. Tricker's also do sleeker boots like the Harlech but they're not usually standard production models. The Jermyn store might have some special make up though.
I'd personally concentrate on C&J but that's because my closet is already full of Tricker's.
Pricewise, don't forget to do whatever it is you have to do to be able to claim back VAT which is like 20%.
Kwhite: I definitely agree that I prefer the light edging. I had the chance to pick up a pair of Ravello LWBs with antique edging when I got my Cigar LWBs (also antique) but, with how dark the Ravello is now, they would've looked damn near the same shoe.
Also, hopefully this photo shows the color difference a bit:
The right shoe (on the left in the photo) has a red translucent look going on in the toe area. The other shoe is more of a solid brown. Am I just being nuts here, or is there a noticeable difference? And, if so, will the difference become less noticeable with time?
Why break up a fine combination! Great looking boots my friend. Enjoy in great health...
As someone that has both ravello and cigar LWB, I prefer the dark brown edge on the ravello. (A) It makes the ravello more versatile in that it can be dressed up; the light edge pretty much makes it one dimensional... casual to business casual. (B) you would in fact have approximately the same shoe as the Cigar with antique edge. If I could only have one or the other, I might have different preference.Kwhite: I definitely agree that I prefer the light edging. I had the chance to pick up a pair of Ravello LWBs with antique edging when I got my Cigar LWBs (also antique) but, with how dark the Ravello is now, they would've looked damn near the same shoe.
Oddly enough, I agree with your disagreement! As you know, I've got both the 9015 & 9016, I'm actually wearing the 9016 at the moment.
While I think the 9015 is the better choice for a one-Balmoral-only shoe wardrobe because it works well with both navy and charcoal, my favorite business attire combo is a solid charcoal suit with a shiny black balmoral.
I find my self preferring the antique edging to the brown edging, all tho both pickups this week are dark <shrug> no choice
There is a noticeable difference.Kwhite: I definitely agree that I prefer the light edging.
Am I just being nuts here, or is there a noticeable difference?