I keep on returning to the same theme: that some posters on SF always look great in whatever suit they wear. Their faces are usually obscured, so it can't be that. I now believe that there's a sort of harmonious equation at work here. Rather like the Golden Ratio, but less complicated. Trini, Holdfast and Parker are such examples. I would also mention Voxsartia, but he was particularly cruel about my first and only pic on SF... I don't think that I can ever forgive him. The psychiatrists at the secure unit said it would've tipped any sane man over the edge. The fact that Fuuma joined in the mocking didn't help either. Anyway, Larry (in charge of restraining straps and electrodes) says I should now try to see the good in people. But back to the equation... height alone isn't it, as some taller men look spindly and spiteful in their suits (and I'm not one to stereotype). A wide pectoral expanse can't be it either, as many built like this appear stodgy, wobbly and violently menacing. In fact the bigger the muscles, the more they remind me of Russian Mafia. The best suits that money can buy definitely ain't it, as many still look like Bulgarian coach drivers. So, what is it? Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could input our personal specifications into such an equation. Once it had concluded, 'Lear will always look like crap', I'd have saved myself a fortune, not to mention the time spent here. Lear (waiting for the MÃ
daille d'Or to dry)