The Ethos of Consumerism and Luxury Consumption

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by bourbonbasted, Jul 30, 2012.

  1. SkinnyGoomba

    SkinnyGoomba Senior member

    Messages:
    12,594
    Likes Received:
    1,654
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Location:
    Princeton, NJ
    Charity is not entirely free of ego-stroking, so his thinking there is a bit flawed. There are regular people behind these brands making a decent living, not just the 'evil corporations' of the world that are trying to scathe you via pricing. I'd wager that there are more people making a killing off of the lowest common denominator of product than that of luxury goods. You just don't hear it as often because the consumer is under the false impression that they're getting a better deal, simply because the price is lower overall.
     
  2. ethanm

    ethanm Senior member

    Messages:
    10,623
    Likes Received:
    3,607
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Location:
    أرض العزم
    I think one of the lines that can be drawn is when something becomes more expensive without adding any real benefit to the item and may in fact detract from its usefulness. The best example of this that popped up recently is the thread about precious metal collar stays, which are undoubtedly unnecessary as steel or plastic stays do the job better and very much more cheaply.
     
  3. Quadcammer

    Quadcammer Senior member

    Messages:
    2,970
    Likes Received:
    277
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    

    Its all about preferences. Some may think a 2 week trip to bali is excessive and he may not. If he likes to engage in philantrophy, thats great...but that doesn't mean spending one's money on whatever they enjoy is excessive or improper.

    For example, I spent a ton of money on two cars that I really enjoy. I'm not a huge fan of extended travel, so that saves me a lot of money. People ask me how the hell I manage to have a porsche and s-class, but then they go on 2 week vacations to australia. I point that out to them and all i hear is...well thats different.

    yup, its all personal preference. That said, If it ever got to the point where I had so many cars that I hardly drove some of them, I'd have to reconsider whether its excessive.



    same thread came to mind for me. $700 collar stays to me is excessive.
     
  4. celery

    celery Senior member

    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    69
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    In my view, gluttony begins once the threshold of diminishing returns has been crossed. For every item there is that point where function, style, craftsmanship and luxury meet. And as you continue beyond that point, you are abandoning style and function and are pursuing decadence.

    This point sometimes varies from person to person, but a general consensus can often be reached. Diminishing returns can be blatantly obvious as somethings really only improve incrementally (and sometimes improvement completely ends and you are buying pure exclusivity). A great example is the famous Birkin bag. A $50,000 price tag is not out of the ordinary for these bags. At what price point did you leave behind function and craftsmanship and enter into luxury; then, when did you leave luxury behind for exclusivity?

    Again, this imaginary point varies from person to person based on their means, but for the majority of us, it should be fairly close.

    Last bit of note, I don't particularly view gluttony in a negative light despite the word having strong negative connotations. But I think this too will vary from person to person.
     
  5. dieworkwear

    dieworkwear Senior member

    Messages:
    7,670
    Likes Received:
    12,427
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Has anyone read Singer's Famine, Affluence, and Morality?

    A video for those who are too lazy to read

    [VIDEO][/VIDEO]

    By the way, his argument can go until the marginal benefit to you of not saving your shoes (or not buying a new pair) is equal the benefit of helping someone in a worse state than yourself. This is not an argument for moderation.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2012
  6. asad.javid

    asad.javid New Member

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    I think your question has been some what answered in " The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America's Wealthy "
     
  7. Gdot

    Gdot Senior member

    Messages:
    5,248
    Likes Received:
    273
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Money, pardon the expression, is like manure. It's not worth a thing unless it's spread around, encouraging young things to grow.
     
  8. in stitches

    in stitches Kung Joo Moderator

    Messages:
    68,895
    Likes Received:
    31,016
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    i apologize, this is a conversation i have had many times, mostly with my father, so i am compelled to write something here. however, i wasnt able to read all the posts yet, so forgive me if i am touching on points already covered.

    this conversation usually comes up for me in the context of watches, usually in the 250K+ range. obviously that is an extreme example, but i think the same argument can be had over 2000 dollar shoes, or a 5000 dollar suit.

    my general opinion is, if you can afford it, and you are using your recourses properly elsewhere (schools, charity, family...) i see no reason why its is wrong. i appreciate the craftsmanship that goes into these things, and i feel if you have the dough, and you feel comfortable making purchases like that, be it a watch for 6 figures, or a suit for 20K, or shoes for 7k.... than why not.

    my father on the other hand, firmly disagrees with me. even though he can appreciate the craftsmanship that goes into these wares, and even in a situation where one had the recourses, so they were not damaging themselves financially, and was using their money for other humanitarian causes equally as well, he still feels it is not right. his feeling is that such a sum of money for such an object, despite all the above, is just not appropriate.

    where each person draws the line though, is also different. for example, at what point would my father be ok with a watch purchase? he does not feel than anything beyond utilitarian use is wasteful, he can appreciate fine craftsmanship. so is the line 2k, 5k, 10k... who knows.

    and to be honest, i cant really argue against his point. in the end, i think all these things are about different philosophies, and there is no real right or wrong. much of it is based on a persons upbringing, or their personal experiences, but its all valid imo. the main thing for me is, that a person do what they feel comfortable with, and that their consumerism is not at the expense of more important things in life.

    great topic bourbon!
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2012
  9. Bounder

    Bounder Senior member

    Messages:
    2,249
    Likes Received:
    440
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    

    Millions of college students are using this one on their parents even as we speak.
     
  10. celery

    celery Senior member

    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    69
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    

    As they should. Having a child should come with a warning, "The rest of your life, and all of your money are forfeit."
     
  11. hendrix

    hendrix Ill-proportioned

    Messages:
    9,457
    Likes Received:
    3,716
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    

    Yes, I think this too.
    I find it more justifiable to buy bespoke clothing and shoes than RTW because you know to whom the money is going. Moreover, I think that the amount paid is not all that relevant, it's more about the number of clothes relative to your need. I find all high end watches and cars excessive from a style perspective, but I understand that it's more of a hobby to these people - so it's more like spending money on a nice guitar, which I'm more comfortable with in my head. OTOH, you could justify clothing as a hobby, and then things get a little murky.

    Lastly, I think that some of the excessive purchasing we see on the forum could be considered indicative of some problems on the part of the purchaser. There's something about a need to buy lots and lots of clothes that just seems a little bit sick. Almost like an addiction. The other problem with this is that when you're constantly buying new stuff you forget to enjoy what you already have.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2012
  12. Quadcammer

    Quadcammer Senior member

    Messages:
    2,970
    Likes Received:
    277
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    

    that is a big part of it and is real. The thrill comes from making the purchase, not necessarily the item itself. On rare occasion I feel that way, recognize it and cut back.
     
  13. CBrown85

    CBrown85 Senior member

    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    641
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    I doubt anyone here will argue that they're on the wrong 'side' of this spending debate- though someone made a comment about the friend wearing clothing from the GAP. I know a great many people who see things such as The Gap as being "fancy". Most people have no concept of bespoke at all, nor do they care. I worry that those who think that just because they're spending 2000 on a pair of shoes they're somehow 'better' than someone who cares little about 'aesthetics' or whatever. Or maybe I spend too much time with inner-city kids.
     
  14. CBrown85

    CBrown85 Senior member

    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    641
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    

    "More pleasure can be had from from wanting rather than having. It is not logical but it is often true." (or something)

    - Mr. Spock
     
  15. hendrix

    hendrix Ill-proportioned

    Messages:
    9,457
    Likes Received:
    3,716
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    

    I started a whole thread on SW&D as a backlash to the phenomenon. I am certainly not immune to it myself, which is most of the reason I started the thread.

    Why do so many people feel that they need to try each and every shoe brand that has a thread on SF? Every group MTO project?
    I used to want every new MTO project, now I've recovered and have resolved to stick to one shoemaker.

    Everything needs to be better. It's not enough to have green wholecuts. They need to be shell cordovan, because shell cordovan is more expensive and therefore better. etc etc.

    Some people genuinely want a quirky item, cool. But I would hazard that for many people this desire is kinda self-perpetuating, at least from what i'm seeing. It just makes me feel a little bit uncomfortable.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2012

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by