STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Nice. I dunno how you got to this position though. Your opponent seems to have so many major pieces just sorta hanging out, doing nothing.if had to choose i think this is my hardest fought checkmate , -10 in material to a known opponent , the pawn at f7 was decisive imho
View attachment 1966745
Nice. I dunno how you got to this position though. Your opponent seems to have so many major pieces just sorta hanging out, doing nothing.
That past pawn has two major pieces pointed right at i, with zero repercussions for taking that pawn, and at least one of them had to have been in place before your move Qf6, and in fact, the rook would have moved to safety.
Do you use the game review? I bet that that was pretty wild.
One of my new favorite YouTube clip series is this cute girl, whose parents are Grand Masters.
She shows up and destroys the New York chess in the park dudes...
I also liked the one where she got to play a spontaneous game against Magnus.Anna Cramling is super fun on twitch as well - her relationship and dynamics with her parents is very touching. I think that her parents, and mother in particular, is both proud of their daughter, and maybe slightly bemused by her success, and also not so quietly hoping that she would just study more chess, and spend less time making up dubious meme openings. She seems to really want to live up to her parents expectations as well, but is clearly not as dedicted a student as her mother. I think that you can see this in her hating endgames. Apparently, a lot of endgames are just theory - that is, a lot of them are fully calculated, and if you know them, you are guaranteed a win, or a draw, depending on your position, and can nearly premove, as long as you have studied enough and simply make no mistakes.
Apparently. this is how she had her breakout as a streamer - she was charming in a very girl next door/kid sister, bright young person (depending on your age) way that made you cheer for her. She just is a lot more personable and less defensive than a lot of chess personalities, and while she clearly wants to win and dislikes losing, her reactions to both winning and losing are neither gloating nor angry, respectively. She is happy or a bit sad and disappointed.I also liked the one where she got to play a spontaneous game against Magnus.
She really held her own for quite a bit, and even had him saying, "oh good move, good move"
Well, when you spend .99cents of your genius dollar on chess, something is going to fall through the cracks.Her cooking skills seem really, really bad, though. Not sure how you mess up cooking pasta with Halloumi cheese, though.
She has pretty good style, though she was probabloy not brought up with a ton of fashion talk in her household, and she is still too young to really have figured our her tastes completely. This jacket is pretty cool. Apparently, she took advantage of her travel to the US, and NYC in particular, to pick up some nice pieces.Well, when you spend .99cents of your genius dollar on chess, something is going to fall through the cracks.
Anna Cramling is super fun on twitch as well - her relationship and dynamics with her parents is very touching. I think that her parents, and mother in particular, is both proud of their daughter, and maybe slightly bemused by her success, and also not so quietly hoping that she would just study more chess, and spend less time making up dubious meme openings. She seems to really want to live up to her parents expectations as well, but is clearly not as dedicted a student as her mother. I think that you can see this in her hating endgames. Apparently, a lot of endgames are just theory - that is, a lot of them are fully calculated, and if you know them, you are guaranteed a win, or a draw, depending on your position, and can nearly premove, as long as you have studied enough and simply make no mistakes.
I'm not an expert at chess (by any stretch) so I would say something like e5. But I honestly don't know how to evaluate such a thing.here's a game that i'm playing rn
View attachment 1968235
the board is quite closed , i feel good about my chances
what does the thread think is the most important square here ?