STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
The only 'device' I use is a pedgraph--which is just a sheet of inked rubber stretched across a frame to take a footprint. And of course a 'stick' and a pen. Do those qualify as "doohickeys"?
Do you think this says a lot about the professional? Have you seen how the shoe looks when you have cut it?Is he on this thread or forum? Would love to hear his perspective or comments on the subject of how it improves his measurement results.
If I recall correctly (on this video I saw), Wegan uses this compass looking thing, a ruler, some widgetty thing that is metallic and conforms to the foot, a circular object. This man has all the fancy gadgets.
Unfortunately, I've only ever used the "old timers" that use paper, a ruler, pencil, and their hands. None of that fun stuff that makes it feel like a science experiment. Admittedly though, I do always get a fantastic fit with plain boring method.
I have no idea about how it works
Do you think this says a lot about the professional? Have you seen how the shoe looks when you have cut it?
If that is the first test, it means that he doesn't have much idea of making custom shoes, yes, I know that he is a champion in making competition shoes, but that has nothing to do with working to measure.
Have you observed the shoe arrangement? That image speaks for itself, he has no idea how the lasts are arranged, I am sorry but I see it at a great distance.
As I said before, it is very easy to distinguish who knows how to work from who does not know how to do it.
If you see that a professional does not have much variety in his work, begin to suspect that he is very limited and he will be good at it, but nothing else.
Just watch, the images say a lot. If you see someone who makes lasts but always does the same, with the same forms ........ when someone different arrives and asks for another type of shoe, they will be unable to do so because they have only learned that and that form of to work.
And believe me, you do not learn by doing 20 shoes a year, no, it takes many many more and to do it continuously and above all you must work alone, to learn and pay attention not to fail since that costs you money ..... .
The four or five that remain in my country have an RTW line, all of them began to measure and finally gave up because they spent months taking apart shoes and trying them on clients, which was not profitable. Finally the client was pissed off and the shoemaker demoralized .......
Thats the reality.
Do you think this says a lot about the professional? Have you seen how the shoe looks when you have cut it?
If that is the first test, it means that he doesn't have much idea of making custom shoes, yes, I know that he is a champion in making competition shoes, but that has nothing to do with working to measure.
Have you observed the shoe arrangement? That image speaks for itself, he has no idea how the lasts are arranged, I am sorry but I see it at a great distance.
As I said before, it is very easy to distinguish who knows how to work from who does not know how to do it.
If you see that a professional does not have much variety in his work, begin to suspect that he is very limited and he will be good at it, but nothing else.
Just watch, the images say a lot. If you see someone who makes lasts but always does the same, with the same forms ........ when someone different arrives and asks for another type of shoe, they will be unable to do so because they have only learned that and that form of to work.
And believe me, you do not learn by doing 20 shoes a year, no, it takes many many more and to do it continuously and above all you must work alone, to learn and pay attention not to fail since that costs you money ..... .
The four or five that remain in my country have an RTW line, all of them began to measure and finally gave up because they spent months taking apart shoes and trying them on clients, which was not profitable. Finally the client was pissed off and the shoemaker demoralized .......
Thats the reality.
Here are two photo essay, showing the fitting process as used by John Lobb Paris (the Alma Mater of most of the important French shoemaker).
Bespoke shoe - John Lobb Paris
Men's collection - fashionologie | fashion news | fashion shows | designers | models and ...coolechicstyletodressitalian.blogspot.com
John Lobb Bespoke Boots and Shoes Service
John Lobb provides bespoke boots and shoes service for over 150 years. The company last maker, Francois Maddonini’s father was a leatherworker in the Company Marius Pat (subsidiary of Hermès)…hkdotblogger.wordpress.com
The essays are from 2008 and 2016 respectively, so it is not last years fashion gimmick. But I do not know when JLP took up the technique and if they are the actual 'inventors'. As far as I know, most of the top French (and quite a few Japanese) houses practice that way of checking the fit of the trial shoe.
Now, I have quite complicated feet (all makers agree on this, and they enjoy trashtalking my feet when they meet, overheard it myself a couple of times,
They do not qualify as doohickeys haha. That's the "old timer" stuff I referred to previously.
Usually the younger shoemakers have all the gadgets. Considering I do not own a Bespoke shoe from a guy/gal younger than 45 (maybe older actually), I do not have the exposure J.Ings has to the modern shoemaker and their methods of measurement and shoemaking.
Hoping to change that though
??.
I want to hear more stories about shoemakers trash-talking customers' feet.
Picture of Paul Wilson doing the cutting of my trial shoes. This was over multiple fittings.
View attachment 1403539
I posted this before either here or the JL thread. I had multiple fittings before the final shoes. I wore them about 2 months before having JL take them back and correct the size since it was too much space in the toe box. I'm pretty sure the shoes were shortened from the trial fitting to the finished shoe.I'd be interested in knowing in how this all came out. Given the tape measure on the floor, I'm thinking there must be two full inches (or close by) of clearance between the end of the foot and the inside end of the shoe.
Seems inordinately excessive to me.
Maybe it's just the photo or an early stage in the fitting process, but all the literature suggestss 3 full sizes (each size being 1/3 of and inch) clearance for a medium round toe.
IMO, FWIW...