• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Talking stocks, trading, and investing in general

gdl203

Purveyor of the Secret Sauce
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
45,626
Reaction score
54,485
There's nothing wrong with your strategy or writing puts (as long as you understand the risk, which you do). All I was saying, and maybe it wasn't coming through clearly, is that it sounded from your rationale that you have a long term point of view on this stock, but you're using a short term strategy to execute it. I don't get it. I feel like buying and holding the underlying or buying an out of the money call is the appropriate strategy for a bullish sentiment. The risk profile is entirely understood without having to rely on outs that have an unclear cost and counterparty risk.

I'm just curious why you don't apply a classic long term approach to a long term bullish sentiment. That's all. Not here to give any advice or second guess your trade.
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
81,833
Reaction score
63,360
A combo of just having some fun and being a thrifty Scot trying to squeeze something out of possibly nothing. ;)
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
81,833
Reaction score
63,360
Wow, what a bloodbath this week. OM no doubt is making huge bank as I know he was prepared for this.
 

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
12,663
Reaction score
6,204
Worst is yet to come. Maybe not next week or the week after, but its inevitable. That or get ready for sub-bond yield returns from most equities for years to come.
 

gdl203

Purveyor of the Secret Sauce
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
45,626
Reaction score
54,485
Really? I'd be surprised if Dow did not hit 35k in 2021
 

otc

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
24,529
Reaction score
19,184
Worst is yet to come. Maybe not next week or the week after, but its inevitable. That or get ready for sub-bond yield returns from most equities for years to come.

Let's aim for next Wednesday please.
 

jbarwick

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
8,726
Reaction score
9,681
Wow, what a bloodbath this week. OM no doubt is making huge bank as I know he was prepared for this.

Wasn't he out at like Dow 23K? Plus he moved to more boring things lately.

Worst is yet to come. Maybe not next week or the week after, but its inevitable. That or get ready for sub-bond yield returns from most equities for years to come.

Tech is down big but the broader market is <10% off highs. Every time you post this I have to remind you about March of last year...the world shut down and the S&P was only off 33%.
 

javyn

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
25,518
Reaction score
14,821
t11dmo6mu4l61.jpg
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
81,833
Reaction score
63,360
When I said that SPY was down from 394 last week to 372 for a 5.5% decline. I'd call that brutal in such a short time.
 

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
12,663
Reaction score
6,204
Wasn't he out at like Dow 23K? Plus he moved to more boring things lately.



Tech is down big but the broader market is <10% off highs. Every time you post this I have to remind you about March of last year...the world shut down and the S&P was only off 33%.

Why are the highs relevant? Are those highs indicative of long term fundamental value? Do those highs pay my neighbor's rent or my father's health insurance premiums? Last week, the dividend yield on the S&P500 was lower than the 10 year Treasury yield. What is the excess of beta for the market over the ten year Treasury? Yes, there are other elements of return to holding the equity, including capital gains/growth, but when the cash yield on a portfolio with a beta of 1 is roughly the same as the cash yield on a security with a beta probably 1/5th that, I start to wonder. Just like folks looked around housing markets in California, Florida, almost anywhere, in the late 2000s and thought nothing whatsoever was wrong with THOSE valuations, I believe the average investor is fooling themselves similarly in the current environment.

I actually hope I am wrong, and this is some kind of new paradigm, because then at worst, I've left several months of capital appreciation on the table, and the smaller portion of my assets I left in equities will soothe some of that hit.

Also, the fact that the world shut down amidst a once in a generation pandemic and the S&P regained what it lost in less than 90 trading days is kind of my point.
 

venividivicibj

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
22,867
Reaction score
18,388
There's nothing wrong with your strategy or writing puts (as long as you understand the risk, which you do). All I was saying, and maybe it wasn't coming through clearly, is that it sounded from your rationale that you have a long term point of view on this stock, but you're using a short term strategy to execute it. I don't get it. I feel like buying and holding the underlying or buying an out of the money call is the appropriate strategy for a bullish sentiment. The risk profile is entirely understood without having to rely on outs that have an unclear cost and counterparty risk.

I'm just curious why you don't apply a classic long term approach to a long term bullish sentiment. That's all. Not here to give any advice or second guess your trade.
Pio is in his ‘day trader’ shtick right now. It’ll pass in ~1 month or so. Still think it’s better than the ‘Lean Fire’ shtick. At least no debates over re-using toilet paper costs.
 

jbarwick

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
8,726
Reaction score
9,681
Why are the highs relevant? Are those highs indicative of long term fundamental value? Do those highs pay my neighbor's rent or my father's health insurance premiums? Last week, the dividend yield on the S&P500 was lower than the 10 year Treasury yield. What is the excess of beta for the market over the ten year Treasury? Yes, there are other elements of return to holding the equity, including capital gains/growth, but when the cash yield on a portfolio with a beta of 1 is roughly the same as the cash yield on a security with a beta probably 1/5th that, I start to wonder. Just like folks looked around housing markets in California, Florida, almost anywhere, in the late 2000s and thought nothing whatsoever was wrong with THOSE valuations, I believe the average investor is fooling themselves similarly in the current environment.

I actually hope I am wrong, and this is some kind of new paradigm, because then at worst, I've left several months of capital appreciation on the table, and the smaller portion of my assets I left in equities will soothe some of that hit.

Also, the fact that the world shut down amidst a once in a generation pandemic and the S&P regained what it lost in less than 90 trading days is kind of my point.

 

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
12,663
Reaction score
6,204
I'll just kind of leave these here to speak for themselves.

exA.png
exB.png
exC.png
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 89 36.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.6%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,803
Messages
10,592,045
Members
224,319
Latest member
DonaGarciay
Top