• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • Carmina one of our oldest sponsors - we first met them at Pitti Uomo in 2012 and hosted them at a truck show in 2015 - is right now offering up to 25% off in their winter sale. Browse their extensive selection of some of Spain's finest shoes (and accessories,) or use their customization program to get something truly unique and made just for you.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Talking stocks, trading, and investing in general

UnFacconable

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
4,513
Reaction score
9,342
First decade in the 2000s US equities (large cap growth) did poorly. The last 10 years US outperformed.

Thoughts on the next decade (US tech will maintain its dominance--all ships will rise with the tide e.g., energy and infrastructure spending)? Or will we see a mean reversion instead?

Yes.

People may have views but I think it would be foolish to take action on it. VTI and/or S&P500 is likely to beat any portfolio that is tilted away from them. Hedge fund dudes spend all day long with a lot of resources at their disposal and very rarely can reliably beat the market just by investing in public securities so I doubt that there is some simple secret to unlock excess gains.

US equities have a lot of exposure to international markets so to the extent the US economy were to lag, that doesn’t necessarily mean US stocks would lag. But they could.

You have to decide what risks you are willing to take.
 

javyn

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
26,104
Reaction score
16,525
The future of finance is hear

1737060348493.png
 

gettoasty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
16,717
Reaction score
11,294
This is throwing me for a loop

Roth 401k vs Pretax 401k, unless your future marginal tax rate drops significantly, Roth 401k seems to produce more wealth inclusive of tax. Say 37% vs 22% i.e., a household will need to drop several rungs down. My initial thought is this calculator is looking at someone's lifetime in a linear manner or strictly growth and taxes. Factoring in spending and RMD?


Edit:
The assumed reinvesting tax-savings at 7% LT return completely excludes other utility e.g., second home, kids, etc. ?? No other cash flow considerations. Calculator is helpful to look at things financially per se but otherwise one dimensional it seems.
 
Last edited:

double00

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
18,920
Reaction score
18,916
This is throwing me for a loop

Roth 401k vs Pretax 401k, unless your future marginal tax rate drops significantly, Roth 401k seems to produce more wealth inclusive of tax. Say 37% vs 22% i.e., a household will need to drop several rungs down. My initial thought is this calculator is looking at someone's lifetime in a linear manner or strictly growth and taxes. Factoring in spending and RMD?


Edit:
The assumed reinvesting tax-savings at 7% LT return completely excludes other utility e.g., second home, kids, etc. ?? No other cash flow considerations. Calculator is helpful to look at things financially per se but otherwise one dimensional it seems.

that's like the whole feature of the Roth platform imho , the vehicle represents a revenue loss to the gov't .

i remember when Roth IRA came out they had pretty low limits on contributions , iirc the revenue loss issue was why .

somebody else can weigh in on the math but I always figured it as a limited cherry for taxpayers
 

venividivicibj

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
23,813
Reaction score
19,690
This is throwing me for a loop

Roth 401k vs Pretax 401k, unless your future marginal tax rate drops significantly, Roth 401k seems to produce more wealth inclusive of tax. Say 37% vs 22% i.e., a household will need to drop several rungs down. My initial thought is this calculator is looking at someone's lifetime in a linear manner or strictly growth and taxes. Factoring in spending and RMD?


Edit:
The assumed reinvesting tax-savings at 7% LT return completely excludes other utility e.g., second home, kids, etc. ?? No other cash flow considerations. Calculator is helpful to look at things financially per se but otherwise one dimensional it seems.
Sometimes people can work part time late in life? Would be a great time to convert IRA-->Roth when at very low/marginal tax brackets. But yes, I think generally, you're right.

It is good to have both Roth and Pretax though, so you can kind of finagle tax brackets when combining both incomes in retirement, leading you to take home lots of money with very little tax implications.
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
84,112
Reaction score
69,852
Sometimes people can work part time late in life? Would be a great time to convert IRA-->Roth when at very low/marginal tax brackets. But yes, I think generally, you're right.

It is good to have both Roth and Pretax though, so you can kind of finagle tax brackets when combining both incomes in retirement, leading you to take home lots of money with very little tax implications.

Not sure you can finagle things like that. I think there’s proportional assumptions concerning withdrawal, i.e. your withdrawals in a year will be assumed to consist of the proportions of your entire portfolio.
 

Hombre Secreto

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
7,557
Reaction score
5,543
that's like the whole feature of the Roth platform imho , the vehicle represents a revenue loss to the gov't .

i remember when Roth IRA came out they had pretty low limits on contributions , iirc the revenue loss issue was why .

somebody else can weigh in on the math but I always figured it as a limited cherry for taxpayers

For non-business folks wouldn't it be better to put REIT stocks that won't be penalized with dividends being taxed?
 

jbarwick

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
9,093
Reaction score
10,243
We have a few hundred K in Trad IRAs so we would have a big tax bill if we converted. I could probably talk to a professional about it but I am not really worried too much about the tax on my small nest egg.
 

imatlas

Saucy White Boy
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
26,320
Reaction score
32,320
My 401K offers the "Roth IRA Mega Backdoor" which isn't nearly as sexy as it sounds. I started using that last year in order to be able to maximize the finagling the @venividivicibj mentioned, but I suspect my retirement horizon may be too close for it to actually make much of a difference.
 

jack webb

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2003
Messages
750
Reaction score
866
I believe you have to wait five years before withdrawing money that has been converted from a traditional IRA/401(K) to a Roth IRA, which makes that tactic less appealing to someone near retirement. Conversions probably make the most sense for those with at least 20 years to go. In exchange for the up-front tax hit you get a chance to compound your wealth over decades, and then get it all tax-free.
 

losrockets

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
1,663
I opened a solo401k through Employee Fiduciary with my 1099 income. Already maxing out my w2 employer sponsored 401k but I can put in an employer contribution to the solo 401k up to 20%ish of 1099 income and also make voluntary after tax Roth contributions up to the lesser of the total combined 401k limit or my remaining 1099 income. It's the "mega backdoor" option referenced above and a better option than my brokerage since I won't be taxed on withdrawal.
 

venividivicibj

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
23,813
Reaction score
19,690
My 401K offers the "Roth IRA Mega Backdoor" which isn't nearly as sexy as it sounds. I started using that last year in order to be able to maximize the finagling the @venividivicibj mentioned, but I suspect my retirement horizon may be too close for it to actually make much of a difference.
It actually is as sexy as it sounds, because it's not limited by the usual 21-23k yearly maximum limit, but rather the 69k total limit
 

gettoasty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
16,717
Reaction score
11,294
All good discussions, I resonate with the tax diversification i.e., leveraging pretax, Roth, and taxable investments/savings. However, this all still misses the mark to my OP.

If you're going to stay in the same marginal tax bracket pre- and post-retirement, and the objective is maximizing your employer's retirement plan, the numbers illustrate that a Roth 401k is preferrable to pretax 401k. This is quite contrary to popular belief where most is pretax, which I can only presume people want more take home pay today and knowing what the future holds is difficult.

This calculator does a better job teasing this out (no option to reinvest the additional take home pay or tax savings).


If that's the case my mind is blown unless there's something I'm not accounting for besides budget i.e., most people would want more pay today. But at higher marginal tax rates, there's enough discretionary income to really consider this IMO. Less the second reason besides higher take home pay is a butt load of tax liability today that can be discouraging. Think about it--pretax savings = lower tax liability. Roth savings = higher tax liability (but more money/income in the future).

Factoring higher tax rates across the board in the US at some future date, this makes Roth 401k (or IRA) even more favorable today i.e., pay the relatively low rates now.

As mentioned, the best of both worlds per se with most flexibility is taking advantage of the pretax 401k + "after-tax-auto-conversion to Roth 401k" = $70k this year.

To frame it another way, pretax 401k seems most optimal if there is fair certainty future marginal tax rate is several rungs lower than today i.e., 24% to 12%. For households at higher marginal tax rate today, I have to assume they'll be at the same marginal tax rate in the future if not more due to pension and accumulation of other appreciating assets e.g., rentals that all fill in the income gap if not more vs. prime earning years.

tl;dr
  • If you're at 24% marginal tax rate and below, I think pretax 401k is fine. (Big assumption is your future marginal tax rate will drop)
  • If you're at 24% marginal tax rate and above, I think Roth 401k is better. (Big assumption is your future marginal tax rate will stay the same or go higher)
  • The wildcard being if workplace offers the "after-tax" option that can auto convert to Roth, allowing building of both tax buckets.
  • If US tax rates explode at a future date, this is all moot.
 
Last edited:

Featured Sponsor

Who are your favorite fabric producers for MTM/Bespoke shirts? Choose up to 3

  • Albini

  • Canclini

  • Thomas Mason

  • Grandi & Rubinelli

  • Monti

  • Bonfanti

  • Söktas

  • David & John Anderson

  • Leggiuno

  • Testa

  • S.I.C. Tess

  • Alumo

  • Getzner


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
524,146
Messages
10,753,206
Members
229,961
Latest member
stacykdavis6
Top