• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • The Uniform/LA Lennon Loose Fit jeans drop is now live! Check out both the light Palms and dark Lithium Both are made from premium Japanese right hand 3x1 denim in the USA,. Uniform/LA is know for premium materials and meticulous pattern making. Support a small business built on quality and integrity.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Talking stocks, trading, and investing in general

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
82,890
Reaction score
66,361
So were yen carry trades really the reason for Monday's sell off?
 

double00

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
17,996
Reaction score
18,380
So were yen carry trades really the reason for Monday's sell off?

i suspect the underlying story is the search for value in the face of a strengthening usd . yen carry trade is downstream of that imho .
 

gettoasty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
16,440
Reaction score
10,746
How would you interpret this?

Slide12.PNG
 

brokencycle

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
29,962
Reaction score
33,005
How would you interpret this?

Slide12.PNG

Why would I claim SS earlier if I think I can a higher rate of return? Is it because I can use that income to support me while my assets continue to grow?
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
82,890
Reaction score
66,361
i suspect the underlying story is the search for value in the face of a strengthening usd . yen carry trade is downstream of that imho .

Actually the opposite: it was the strengthening yen, and Japanese interest rate hikes, that caused people to unwind their leveraged positions in yen arbitrage.

But what do I know?

🤷‍♂️
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
82,890
Reaction score
66,361
If you're in the position where you need to claim SS at 62 you either expect a short retirement, and/or really have no phucking clue what your expected rate of return is on your nest egg will be, as you don't have a nest egg.
 

UnFacconable

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
3,992
Reaction score
7,367
Why would I claim SS earlier if I think I can a higher rate of return? Is it because I can use that income to support me while my assets continue to grow?
I think it's relatively straight forward but requires knowledge of the future that no one can really have, particularly (as @Piobaire points out) someone who needs to take social security early.

Basically, your social security payments increase the later you take them, but the increase doesn't necessarily increase faster than the rate of return on your investments. And, of course, if you take social security later and don't live very long, you won't get that many payments.

The flaw here is that people don't know how long they will live and mostly don't care to estimate it. Further, no one has any real reason to believe they will achieve an 8%+ rate of return (which would imply they should take earlier).

If you do have some retirement savings though (with plenty of equity exposure) and aren't particularly healthy, claiming at 62 doesn't seem like a terrible idea.
 

brokencycle

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
29,962
Reaction score
33,005
I think it's relatively straight forward but requires knowledge of the future that no one can really have, particularly (as @Piobaire points out) someone who needs to take social security early.

Basically, your social security payments increase the later you take them, but the increase doesn't necessarily increase faster than the rate of return on your investments. And, of course, if you take social security later and don't live very long, you won't get that many payments.

The flaw here is that people don't know how long they will live and mostly don't care to estimate it. Further, no one has any real reason to believe they will achieve an 8%+ rate of return (which would imply they should take earlier).

If you do have some retirement savings though (with plenty of equity exposure) and aren't particularly healthy, claiming at 62 doesn't seem like a terrible idea.

That makes sense. I knew payments go up if you wait, but I didn't think they were related to rate of return. I thought there is a calculated 'full retirement' value and then if you retire at 62 it is 30% less.

I just looked, and I guess you can retire at 70 for an extra 8%/year increase. That was news to me, so now I understand how they're calculating it. I thought it was slightly different (you would need to draw down your own assets less because you have SS income starting at 62) which didn't make sense.
 

Featured Sponsor

Do you coordinate your watch strap with your shoes or belt?

  • Always

  • Sometimes

  • Never

  • I don't pay attention


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
514,414
Messages
10,666,020
Members
226,704
Latest member
sharmasuhani2303
Top