- Joined
- Jan 2, 2013
- Messages
- 2,377
- Reaction score
- 810
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Obviously down to individual preferences and comfort. I prefer socks with loafers for two aesthetic reasons. First, going sockless is likely to provide a less elegant, integrated, line than that produced with well-chosen socks. Secondly, as someone over 50, I don’t want to display my ankles, nor do I particularly want the opportunity to look at my peers’.
When I was in high school, only sailors and convicts had tattoos. I was neither.but the real reason is you don’t want anyone to see that pot leaf tattoo you got in high school, right?
What does the liner do to prevent all that?When I think sockless, I think liner. To wear shoes without socks or anything else covering ones foot is an invitation to permanent foot stink in your shoes not to mention a bacterial or fungal infection.
So “sockless”? Yes. But a liner that is hidden from view? Always.