• We would like to welcome Larimars Luxury Menswear as an official Affiliate Vendor. Larimars, based in Ontario, Canada, and specializing in handmade and semi-handmade shirts made in their family owned factory, with over 1000 fabrics from which to choose!

    Please check out their thread on here, welcome them, and take advantage of their introductory offer for Styleforum. The discount code is in thread!

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Suit and trainers/sneakers

radicaldog

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,239
Reaction score
976
I know this is pushing the MC envelope, but I think it can work. Even with a tie. Some examples:







Basically my sense is that it can work with cotton, corduroy, seersucker, and maybe tweed or woollen (carded) flannel. Thoughts? Photos?
 

EZB

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
5,298
Reaction score
19,722
Proof by contradiction:

Assume it works
If it works, then there is an appropriate venue or occasion for it.
But there is no appropriate venue or occasion for the combination.
Thus, it doesn’t work.
 

radicaldog

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,239
Reaction score
976
If it works, then there is an appropriate venue or occasion for it.
But there is no appropriate venue or occasion for the combination.
Thus, it doesn’t work.
The proof is unsound, since there are venues for which there are combinations that are neither appropriate nor inappropriate.

I leave the demonstration as an exercise for the reader.
 

Thin White Duke

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
4,233
Reaction score
5,698
In the entirety of the universe I suppose there's an infinitesimally small possibility that it could work, but I’ve yet to see it myself and those example pics certainly don’t support the case.

People are always trying to mess with a formula that doesn’t need changing. See also black tie. Any time I see a pic of a bloke in a suit and trainers, especially ugly suede and nylon running shoe type trainers, I can’t help but think there are a number of more optimal options. But don’t worry, there’s a new schlubby tattooed beardy type who’s just become the new editor at GQ so it’s only a matter of time till this look starts getting pushed again.
 

radicaldog

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,239
Reaction score
976
People are always trying to mess with a formula that doesn’t need changing. See also black tie. Any time I see a pic of a bloke in a suit and trainers, especially ugly suede and nylon running shoe type trainers, I can’t help but think there are a number of more optimal options. But don’t worry, there’s a new schlubby tattooed beardy type who’s just become the new editor at GQ so it’s only a matter of time till this look starts getting pushed again.
If we adopt this approach then lounge suits will become what black tie has become: no longer something to wear to dinner, but a fossilised uniform for a few special occasions.
 

radicaldog

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,239
Reaction score
976
And here's another argument: originally tweed or cord suits were the equivalent of today's athleisure. Sneakers didn't exist back then, so people wore other kinds of sporty, comfy shoes with those garments. How do we make the cord/tweed suit more modern? By going back to its origins and pairing it with today's equivalent footwear.
 

suitedcboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
338
Reaction score
157
Suit/sneaker wearer is custodial. Do you think they'd let suit and sneakers on the floor when it's open?
 

JJ Katz

Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
594
Reaction score
614
If we adopt this approach then lounge suits will become what black tie has become: no longer something to wear to dinner, but a fossilised uniform for a few special occasions.
I take your point (and, FWIW, I do think that within a generation a full-on business suit will be a very niche garment).

I would make a different point, however. Starting with the pictures above, there is not one where a pair of loafers or classic lace ups would not have looked better.

Other than lame iGent 'spresatoora points', what is to be gained by wearign sneakers with a suit?
 

radicaldog

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,239
Reaction score
976
Other than lame iGent 'spresatoora points', what is to be gained by wearign sneakers with a suit?
Extending the wearability of suits into the future as everyday garments?
 

Mr. Wonderbeak

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Messages
305
Reaction score
1,470
Well, one reason they stay away is that they're stuffy. And that they are often thought to require relatively uncomfortable shoes.
I’m pretty confident that people will not wear suits just because they can wear sneakers with them. Even a shirt and trousers has become too “dressy” or “stuffy” to use your word. Chinos and polos have become the norm.
 

Featured Sponsor

What time of the year do you spend the most money on clothes?

  • Spring

  • Summer

  • Fall

  • Winter

  • No difference


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
480,863
Messages
10,242,536
Members
215,360
Latest member
sojolseo
Top