• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Stylish way to carry an SLR?

Renault78law

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
2,141
Reaction score
66
Does it exist? Or are you doomed to look like either a tourist or photogeek?
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
17,933
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by Renault78law
Does it exist? Or are you doomed to look like either a tourist or photogeek?

Depends on how much kit you have. The more you have, the harder it's going to be to look stylish. I don't even worry about it, however it's the only time you'll ever see me with a backpack when I'm not hiking. I don't think i've ever seen a particularly attractive camera bag though. I'm sure this si the real reason nantucket shoots with a film leica.
 

Tokyo Slim

In Time Out
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
19,178
Reaction score
14
Depends on how much gear, what sort of SLR, and what you consider stylish I supppose.

There are pretty nice looking shoulder bags for DSLR's out there. The Billingham Hadley bag isn't too horrible looking, comes in various tasteful colors, and is relatively un-camera bag looking.

 

robin

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
12,416
Reaction score
155
Scott Schuman does a good job at this I think.
 

matadorpoeta

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Renault78law
Does it exist? Or are you doomed to look like either a tourist or photogeek?

if it's just one slr you are carrying, and no extra lenses, don't bother with a camera bag. also, i use a wrist strap (sans logo) instead of a neck strap.

if you dress well, you won't look like a tourist or a geek.

the bag tokyo slim posted doesn't look half bad either. the lack of a shoulder strap keeps in from looking feminine or like a camera bag.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
17,933
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by Tokyo Slim
Depends on how much gear, what sort of SLR, and what you consider stylish I supppose.

There are pretty nice looking shoulder bags for DSLR's out there. The Billingham Hadley bag isn't too horrible looking, comes in various tasteful colors, and is relatively un-camera bag looking.



The thing is, that might be fine for carrying a camera from point a to point b, but it's useless for shooting. You can't use the camera and hold the bag. The advantage of LowePro etc is that the're functional. Slingshots rotate and open towards your chest for easy lens swapping, as do some of their backpacks.
 

matadorpoeta

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by GQgeek
The thing is, that might be fine for carrying a camera from point a to point b, but it's useless for shooting. You can't use the camera and hold the bag. The advantage of LowePro etc is that the're functional. Slingshots rotate and open towards your chest for easy lens swapping, as do some of their backpacks.

but this is just plain ugly.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
17,933
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by matadorpoeta
but this is just plain ugly.


I do'nt really see the appeal of those types of bags. The backpacks and the slighshots are by far the most functional. I have a Slingshot 100, which is good for a camera plus two lenses or 1 lens and a flash. They make bigger slignshots, but the fact that all the weight goes on one shoulder turns me off of the bigger ones. My new camera and glass is a lot heavier than my old kit glass and prosumer camera, and i don't even have my new telephoto yet, so i want the even weight distribution of a backpack cause otherwise it starts to hurt my shoulder.
 

matadorpoeta

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by GQgeek
I do'nt really see the appeal of those types of bags. The backpacks and the slighshots are by far the most functional. I have a Slingshot 100, which is good for a camera plus two lenses or 1 lens and a flash. They make bigger slignshots, but the fact that all the weight goes on one shoulder turns me off of the bigger ones. My new camera and glass is a lot heavier than my old kit glass and prosumer camera, and i don't even have my new telephoto yet, so i want the even weight distribution of a backpack cause otherwise it starts to hurt my shoulder.
this thread is called "stylish way to carry an slr?"
 

Tokyo Slim

In Time Out
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
19,178
Reaction score
14
Originally Posted by matadorpoeta
the bag tokyo slim posted doesn't look half bad either. the lack of a shoulder strap keeps in from looking feminine or like a camera bag.

Um... it does have a shoulder strap. Thats why its a shoulder bag.

Maybe you missed that part of my post.



Originally Posted by GQgeek
The thing is, that might be fine for carrying a camera from point a to point b, but it's useless for shooting. You can't use the camera and hold the bag. The advantage of LowePro etc is that the're functional. Slingshots rotate and open towards your chest for easy lens swapping, as do some of their backpacks.

How is it useless for shooting? Why wouldn't you be able to hold the bag and the camera at the same time and you would the lowerpro? The Billingham bag is widely regarded as one of the best and most functional makers of finer camera bags out there. They were one of the first companies to ever make a soft bag.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
17,933
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by matadorpoeta
this thread is called "stylish way to carry an slr?"



My point is that I don't think there is such a way that will also allow you to remain functional. The thing with an SLR is you have multiple lenses. You can go the Bellingham route, but it's non-functional for the wandering photographer. You have to be able to change your lenses quickly in some cases, and that's what the big strength of the slingshot is. And having the bag on your back grants you maneuverability that you lose if you've got a messenger or briefcase style bag. I almost never leave the house without a sportsjacket, and I hate backpacks, but I just don't see any other options.
 

matadorpoeta

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Tokyo Slim
Um... it does have a shoulder strap. Thats why its a shoulder bag.

Maybe you missed that part of my post.

i just looked at the pic which does not show the strap. it lookes much better without it.

btw, i've never found it necessary to hold/wear a camera bag while shooting. i just set it on the ground. many people use their camera bag to anchor their tripod.
 

Tokyo Slim

In Time Out
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
19,178
Reaction score
14
Originally Posted by GQgeek
My point is that I don't think there is such a way that will also allow you to remain functional. The thing with an SLR is you have multiple lenses. You can go the Bellingham route, but it's non-functional for the wandering photographer. You have to be able to change your lenses quickly in some cases, and that's what the big strength of the slingshot is. And having the bag on your back grants you maneuverability that you lose if you've got a messenger or briefcase style bag. I almost never leave the house without a sportsjacket, and I hate backpacks, but I just don't see any other options.

This is all personal opinion, and in no way fact. I've seen way more professional photographers carry something discreet and functional over one of those weekend warrior backpacker monstrosities.

I don't see how digging around in a backpack is easier or faster than a compartmentalized top loading softbag you can open and pull a lens out of with one hand.
 

Tokyo Slim

In Time Out
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
19,178
Reaction score
14
Originally Posted by matadorpoeta
btw, i've never found it necessary to hold/wear a camera bag while shooting. i just set it on the ground. many people use their camera bag to anchor their tripod.

Assuming you only shoot from a tripod, or fixed position, and not walking around or taking shots on the street. Thats sort of not the point here though.
 

matadorpoeta

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Tokyo Slim
This is all personal opinion, and in no way fact. I've seen way more professional photographers carry something discreet and functional over one of those weekend warrior backpacker monstrosities.

I don't see how digging around in a backpack is easier or faster than a compartmentalized top loading softbag you can open and pull a lens out of with one hand.


word.
 

Featured Sponsor

What's your favorite pair of shoes to wear with jeans? (Choose two)

  • Boots (Chelsea, Chukkas, Balmorals, etc.)

  • Loafers

  • Work boots (Red Wing, Wolverine, etc.)

  • Monk strap shoes

  • Oxford / Derby shoes

  • Sneakers


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
427,046
Messages
9,190,773
Members
193,064
Latest member
EKov

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Top