• Hi, I'm the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear and fashion.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Style and "the apprentice"

bryce330

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
805
Reaction score
3
I just saw this article on MSNBC - some amusing comments about Raj and wearing a bow tie in general.
 

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
18
I think Raj looked very dapper, actually. Certainly not appropriate for the occassion, but the MSNBC article was idiotic. First of all, I think that Raj showed an incredible skill in pattern/color matching -- the bow tie and coat actually went with the red pants, as did the spectator shoes. Indeed, it's hard to imagine the red pants looking better with anything else. Secondly, the comment about the pleated pants was probably the dumbest comment in the article. I'm sorry, but can we please recognize that pleats -- if not "hip" in the Prada sense -- are (or can be) graceful, elegant, and classic? Would the bow tie ensemble really have gone better with flat front pants?

The cane clearly was over the top, though.
 

scottmag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
OK, that's a funny article. And it has the flair of televisionwithoutpity.com, which the author happens to write for. It strikes me as a little bit of a look-how-clever-I-am article though. I am a big fan of the over-the-top Trump promotional vehicle masquerading as a reality show. The first thing I noticed about this season's contestants was how well they were dressed. But as I think about it what I was noticing was that the clothes stood out. And the reason they did had to be that they were professionally dressed. Those duds were just too fancy to be all their own clothes. You can check them out in all their bedecked splendor in the latest issue of Fortune magazine where they appear in a ... fashion spread. Unfortunately true comments about bow-ties. Mine sits unused in a drawer. Scott
 

housemaidsknee

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
205
Reaction score
0
hmmm... here's what i think.
the red pants are certainly not businesslike. the bow tie is a little small on him and again better left for more formal events. and a cane - thank god he does not work for me.
 

AlanC

Minister of Trad
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
7,805
Reaction score
83
Yes, Raj was over the top, as I stated in the other Apprentice thread that was mysteriously moved to a random area of the board.

And no, there's nothing wrong with pleats, or for that matter, bow ties, for those who are confident enough to wear them. Others simply leave them in the drawer.
 

bigbadbuff

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2002
Messages
1,790
Reaction score
148
his clothing for the 2nd espisode was very good I thought...
 

dorian

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
518
Reaction score
0
Raj was wearing a gray pinstripe, peak lapel suit - an RL Blue Label S/S suit. Odd to see that.... but certainly better than any other's dress.

I happen to think Raj will win. With relative ease.
 

bryce330

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
805
Reaction score
3
I believe he was wearing a suit with no belt at one point during tonight's show.
 

Brian SD

Moderator
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
9,760
Reaction score
124
I believe he was wearing a suit with no belt at one point during tonight's show.
I actually really like this look, it has a very minimalist appeal to it. Haven't seen the Apprentice though, so can't say how it looks on Raj.
 

esquire.

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
2
I think there was some strategy behind the madness of his attire for the first episode. He knows he's the best, and he wanted to catch everybody's attention, including Trump, from the start. Trump will keep his eye on him afterwards, cause he's intrigued. Of course, this only works if you bring something to the table.
 

montecristo#4

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
12,262
Reaction score
21
I agree that Raj will win. The biggest thing standing in his way, actually, is his sartorial distinctiveness. He did MUCH better tonight, and even used his bow tie collection for competitive advantage.
 

fareau

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
311
Reaction score
5
I am not too surprised that Bradford was fired. The guy virtually challenged Trump to fire him by surrendering his immunity, he told Trump that he wasn't "blowing smoke up your ass", and he got Carolyn's name wrong. He doesn't really have a gift for tact and wouldn't be a very effective subordinate in most enterprises (although he seems to be a good salesman).

I think that Raj has a certain clothing style that elevates him from the surrounding corporate blandness, but he has an affectation of being 30 going on 70 which might wear thin over the ensuing episodes.
 

Bradford

Current Events Moderator
Joined
Mar 19, 2002
Messages
6,717
Reaction score
170
Bradford was an idiot to give up his immunity.

I think people will get real tired of Raj soon - he's awfully obnoxious. I'm sort of expecting one of the girls to win this time, but no one has really risen to the challenge yet.

Bradford
 

montecristo#4

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
12,262
Reaction score
21
It actually really blows my mind how dumb these candidates are in terms of strategy. The project manager almost inevitably brings the wrong people back into the boardroom. People don't make personal alliances the way they should. Stupidity all around.

I also can't figure out why Trump think's it's inevitably an advantage to bring three people for the final board round instead of two. I don't think Trump has really thought it through completely.

M
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Favorite knitwear under jackets/sport coats

  • Crewneck sweater

  • Turtleneck sweater

  • Long-sleeve polo

  • Vest

  • I don't like knitwear worn with jackets/sport coats


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
454,866
Messages
9,854,151
Members
205,511
Latest member
Trim Man
Top