• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Strength Without Bulk

camhard

Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I've searched the forum and googled, but what I found was a bit surprising.

It seems as though the best way to get the most strength to weight is by doing max weight with low reps. I was always taught that 12 reps was a good way to go for no mass and high toning. My brief experience on the football team (where weight is your friend) recommended we do high weight at 4-6 reps. Of course, this leaves me a little confused. Why are endurance athletes so thin then if they are repeatedly doing exercises at a far below maximum intensity?

I suppose it does make some sense, as I remember being surprised how light a lot of fighters are for how strong they appear to be... but I am again confused as fighting requires incredible stamina.

It does make sense to eat only at a maintenance level, though wouldn't this make recovery more difficult? What is the best way to determine the number of calories I need?

By the way, I want to look really good, but would also like to be at the top of my game for sports (road cycling and climbing right now: I know, they're kind of opposite).

Thanks for any help.
 

Pilot

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
2,653
Reaction score
349
Originally Posted by camhard
Why are endurance athletes so thin then if they are repeatedly doing exercises at a far below maximum intensity?

I suppose it does make some sense, as I remember being surprised how light a lot of fighters are for how strong they appear to be... but I am again confused as fighting requires incredible stamina.

It does make sense to eat only at a maintenance level, though wouldn't this make recovery more difficult? What is the best way to determine the number of calories I need?


I don't really understand the first question. Endurance athletes, such as marathon runners, training requires them to run for long periods of times which burns a lot of calories. It also helps the to be as light as possible, so they are carrying less weight over a long distance

I don't understand where this idea that strength and stamina are two separate thing that can't be had at the same time is coming from.

intense weight training (heavy as you can manage for 8-10 reps) + cardio and other activities such as sprints and interval training= strength and stamina.


And just experiment with eating different amount of calories fr a week at a time. maybe eat 3000 calories for a week and keep your same routine exercise wise, see if you gain or lose weight. if you stay the same weight, this could be close to your maintenance calories.
 

rjmaiorano

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,204
Reaction score
1
Climbing requires a high strength/weight ratio so it should go hand in hand with cycling. Although the extra weight in the legs from the cycling will be mostly unnecessary for climbing.
 

thekunk07

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
18,117
Reaction score
3,247
strength and hypertrophy often have little relation.
 

thekunk07

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
18,117
Reaction score
3,247
yeah for sure.
 

why

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,505
Reaction score
368
Originally Posted by Taxler
Is the opposite also true?

There isn't an inverse. Hypertrophy and strength having little relation is the same as strength and hypertrohpy having little relation; the terms are commutative.
 

yachtie

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
4,455
Reaction score
26
Originally Posted by thekunk07
strength and hypertrophy often have little relation.
I've found that to be personally true.
 

bigchris1313

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
141
Reaction score
13
Working out for "tone" is a myth. Doing heavier sets of fewer reps will not make you bigger. Food makes you bigger. Your genes determine how much bigger food makes you, holding other factors equal. If you don't want to get big, don't eat more than necessary; however, eating too little can limit your strength gaisn. Of course, if you are part endo and prone to weight gain, you might find that some gain in size is a byproduct of eating enough to maximize your strength gains, in which case you will need to be more judicious about your nutrition.

But its not as if lifting for fewer reps makes you bigger. That's just a bizarre lie propogated by people afraid to leave their comfort zone because they fear failure and physical pain.
 

camhard

Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Great, thanks. Are there any relatively accurate online calorie estimators? Of course everyone handles food slightly differently, but something to give me a rough idea would be useful.

Thanks again.
 

thekunk07

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
18,117
Reaction score
3,247
calorie king, fit day
 

KBW

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
975
Reaction score
0
A guy I work with is a bodybuilder yet he runs and finishes marathons. He is 285 normally and runs marathons. The guys who run marathons to win them are weak everywhere but their legs but you can get muscle and still have endurance
 

robertorex

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
2,744
Reaction score
6
hm i think as a climber though there is advantage to not letting your body get too big besides just going for strength and endurance.
 

infinittiii

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
look at gymnastic people for example, not alot of them are very big but they strong as ****
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 86 38.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,433
Messages
10,589,254
Members
224,229
Latest member
domhaar
Top