- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 38,393
- Reaction score
- 13,643
There's nothing wrong with the length of those trousers. The hem, yes, but length no.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
There's nothing wrong with the length of those trousers. The hem, yes, but length no.
Isn't the problem with those pants the width at the bottom, not the length? They are so narrow that they cannot fall any lower over the shoe. Lengthening the pants would make them fold up more above the foot, but they would stop at the same place.
Designers cannot keep making the same clothes year in and year out. They would go out of business. So fashions must change.
Getting back to St Crispins, my RMCH charity shoe auction pair will be arriving @ Leathersoul in 2 weeks.