Jlee80
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 265
No snipes here my guy… just different styles.Gentlemen, please.... you're not required to respond to every snipe on the internet.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
No snipes here my guy… just different styles.Gentlemen, please.... you're not required to respond to every snipe on the internet.
His style works for him, mine works for me.Allow me to pick that mic you just dropped up from the floor. There are few things more enjoyable than polite derision, especially when it is oh so warranted. Bravo
I don't believe you featured at all in the comment to which I replied, so carry on my guy, which ironically is a phrasing absolutely worthy of derision my book. It's on my Everest, undoubtedly.His style works for him, mine works for me.
Thanks boss 😒I don't believe you featured at all comment to which I replied, so carry on my guy, which ironically is a phrasing absolutely worthy of derision my book. It's on my Everest, undoubtedly.
In all seriousness, wear what you like. It's your money....just don't toss the passive aggressive sass out there when you get critiques
This is my point though, just because his is more “classic” why is it the default proper? Because you or the posse here think so?I don't believe you featured at all in the comment to which I replied, so carry on my guy, which ironically is a phrasing absolutely worthy of derision my book. It's on my Everest, undoubtedly.
In all seriousness, wear what you like. It's your money....just don't toss the passive aggressive sass out there when you get critiques
Edit: I do think Imp's clothing objectively (at least in the semi-classical sense of menswear) suits his frame better than yours do, well, yours, but at the end of the day individual preferences matter. If something fitting you slightly less "properly" brings you greater pleasure, and makes you feel better whilst wearing it, by all means, have at it. As mentioned, it ain't my money you're spending, so why should my input matter a lick?
It's named for Alfred, Baron of Hiltshire, who first wore this style commanding cavalry during the War of the Roses. Not really, I made that up, but I was wondering the same thing.Folks, does the “hilts” in the name of this cardigan (“hilts shawl cardigan”) mean anything specific like style, mill or stitch or something else? https://www.spierandmackay.com/product/navy---hilts-shawl-cardigan-vp51047-wfl-cdn-fw22
I'd love to actually dive deep into a lecture (feel free to trawl DWW's blog, if so inclined) on the history of tailoring, or suggest looking up the actual definitions of some of the words you're using to perhaps provide a "lightbulb" moment, but, honestly, not worth the time. Far more efficient just saying **** off with the passive aggressive nonsense, and kick rocks. You're right. I'm (won't speak for the "posse" lol) wrong. Those adhering to your POV are the only rational ones in the bunch.This is my point though, just because his is more “classic” why is it the default proper? Because you or the posse here think so?
this has all been very enlightening. Used to be a thread of good gents Before it became a thread of experts. Thanks for the lesson guys. 😒
So adorable..I'd love to actually dive deep into a lecture (feel free to trawl DWW's blog, if so inclined) on the history of tailoring, or suggest looking up the actual definitions of some of the words you're using to perhaps provide a "lightbulb" moment, but, honestly, not worth the time. Far more efficient just saying **** off with the passive aggressive nonsense, and kick rocks. You're right. I'm (won't speak for the "posse" lol) wrong. Those adhering to your POV are the only rational ones in the bunch.
Vaya con dios, Señor. Enjoy the smedium sized tailoring
It's named for Alfred, Baron of Hiltshire, who first wore this style commanding cavalry during the War of the Roses. Not really, I made that up, but I was wondering the same thing.
Rick, if you're reading this, I work cheap and I'm available.For a moment I thought that had been copied/pasted from the Spier website, sounds very much like their copywriting 😂
I time to bury the hatchet… If I came across a bit edgy and what not I apologize. I’ve always valued a lot of your post as well, so I can admit when maybe my delivery wasn’t as proper inappropriate as it could’ve beenI'd love to actually dive deep into a lecture (feel free to trawl DWW's blog, if so inclined) on the history of tailoring, or suggest looking up the actual definitions of some of the words you're using to perhaps provide a "lightbulb" moment, but, honestly, not worth the time. Far more efficient just saying **** off with the passive aggressive nonsense, and kick rocks. You're right. I'm (won't speak for the "posse" lol) wrong. Those adhering to your POV are the only rational ones in the bunch.
Vaya con dios, Señor. Enjoy the smedium sized tailoring
It's named for Alfred, Baron of Hiltshire, who first wore this style commanding cavalry during the War of the Roses. Not really, I made that up, but I was wondering the same thing.